Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Hansen, Sebrina; Aaboe, Jens; Mechlenburg, Inger; Overgaard, Søren; Mikkelsen, Lone Ramer.
Afiliação
  • Hansen S; 1 Center of Rehabilitation, Municipality of Slagelse, Slagelse, Denmark.
  • Aaboe J; 2 National Clinical Guidelines, Danish Health Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Mechlenburg I; 3 Centre of Research in Rehabilitation (CORIR), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Overgaard S; 4 The Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Mikkelsen LR; 5 Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Clin Rehabil ; 33(1): 13-23, 2019 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30073856
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The rehabilitation after a total hip replacement varies in degree of supervision; however, it remains unknown whether supervised programmes are more effective than non-supervised.

OBJECTIVE:

This study compared the effectiveness of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, hip-pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function.

METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise. An electronic search was performed in Medline, Embase and CINAHL on 14 March 2018. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS:

Seven studies were included with a total of 389 participants. A small and non-significant difference in favour of the supervised groups was found in patient-reported function (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.46 to 0.02)), hip-related pain (SMD -0.03 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.21)), health-related quality of life (mean difference (MD) -3.08 (95% CI -6.29 to 0.14)) and performance-based function (SMD -0.26 (95% CI -0.68 to 0.17)) at end of treatment and in patient-reported function (MD -1.31 (95% CI -3.79 to 1.16)) at the 6- to 12-month follow-up.

LIMITATIONS:

The literature search was systematic, but limited to three databases. The overall quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate due to lack of blinding in included studies.

CONCLUSION:

Supervised exercise was not significantly effective compared to non-supervised home-based exercise on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function after primary total hip replacement. OTHERS PROSPERO registration number CRD42017055604.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Artroplastia de Quadril Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Artroplastia de Quadril Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article