Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Information Sources in Plastic Surgery Decision-making.
Parmeshwar, Nisha; Reid, Chris M; Park, Andrew J; Brandel, Michael G; Dobke, Marek K; Gosman, Amanda A.
Afiliação
  • Parmeshwar N; School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
  • Reid CM; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
  • Park AJ; School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
  • Brandel MG; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
  • Dobke MK; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
  • Gosman AA; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Cureus ; 10(6): e2773, 2018 Jun 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30109166
ABSTRACT
Background Today, patients can access a myriad of information sources regarding plastic surgery procedures prior to meeting with a surgeon. Despite their widespread use, the role of these sources in a patient's decision-making remains undefined. We hypothesized that the physician remains the key information source for patients making surgical decisions in plastic surgery, but that other sources may deliver important insights and prove helpful to varying degrees. We also explored motivations for this outside information search and any differences in perceived value among patients. Methods We administered a survey regarding various information sources to our breast reconstruction, reduction, and abdominoplasty patients. Responses were compared between surgery groups and demographic groups. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to determine the impact of patient characteristics on helpfulness rank of different sources. Results Survey results were obtained from 58 patients, of whom 10 (17.2%) had abdominoplasty, 35 (60.3%) breast reconstruction, and 13 (22.4%) breast reduction. The most popular information sources prior to the first surgical appointment were Internet searches (56.9%) and family/friends/other patients (39.7%). After the initial appointment, the most useful sources were plastic surgeons (84.5%), and the Internet (36.2%). Most patients (73.5%) still sought outside information after their appointment. On a Likert-type scale of helpfulness, plastic surgeons ranked 4.28/5, followed by the web-based patient education platform, 3.73 and the Internet, 3.6. A total of 63% of participants listed plastic surgeons as their single most important source of information. In ordinal logistic regression analysis, non-white race was significantly associated with higher rank of surgeon helpfulness (p < 0.05). Relative to low-income patients, income $50-100k (p < 0.05) and $100k+ (p < 0.05) were associated with lower rank of surgeon helpfulness. Conclusions Most patients seek outside information prior to visiting with a surgeon from the Internet, social media, or family and friends. Patients consider plastic surgeons their most valuable information source overall, though still in need of supplementation for varying reasons. Additionally, certain demographic differences affect patient perception of information sources, and this is an important factor for surgeons to consider as they approach educating patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article