Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Primary Care Physicians Beliefs about Prostate-Specific Antigen Evidence Uncertainty, Screening Efficacy, and Test Use.
Ross, Louie E; Hall, Ingrid J; Howard, Daniel L; Rim, Sun Hee; Richardson, Lisa C.
Afiliação
  • Ross LE; Department of Leadership Studies, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USA. Electronic address: leross@ncat.edu.
  • Hall IJ; Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Howard DL; Public Policy Research Institute and Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
  • Rim SH; Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Richardson LC; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 110(5): 491-500, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30129508
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

PURPOSE:

Little is known about primary care physicians' (PCPs) beliefs about prostate cancer screening efficacy, evidence uncertainty, and their actual screening behaviors. We examined factors associated with PCP beliefs about screening efficacy and uncertainty and whether beliefs were associated with prostate specific-antigen (PSA) test use.

METHODS:

The 2008 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Practices Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening collected information on physicians' attitudes, beliefs, and practices related to prostate cancer and screening (n=1,256). Two factors were constructed that measured belief in certainty of evidence for PSA testing and belief in screening efficacy. These factors, along with PCP sociodemographic and practice-related factors, were used to examine associations with offering the PSA test.

RESULTS:

Most PCPs were male (70%), Caucasian (76%), under age 50 (56%), and practiced in communities with more than 50,000 residents (54%). In bivariate analysis, variables associated with PCP belief in evidence uncertainty included female gender, younger age, and lower patient volume. Variables associated with belief in screening efficacy included older age and general and family practice specialty. After adjustment, PCPs with high belief in evidence uncertainty were less likely (OR=0.19, 95% CI=0.06, 0.62) to offer PSA and more likely to practice shared decision making (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.22-2.67). PCPs with high belief in screening efficacy were more likely (OR=2.99, 95% CI=1.15, 7.77) to offer PSA and less likely to practice shared decision making (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.32-0.70).

CONCLUSION:

Our data indicate that belief patterns about evidence uncertainty and the efficacy of using PSA may play a role in whether PCPs offer PSA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Médicos de Atenção Primária Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Médicos de Atenção Primária Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article