Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
KIR Donor Selection: Feasibility in Identifying better Donors.
Weisdorf, Daniel; Cooley, Sarah; Wang, Tao; Trachtenberg, Elizabeth; Haagenson, Michael D; Vierra-Green, Cynthia; Spellman, Stephen; Spahn, Ashley; Vogel, Jenny; Kobusingye, Hati; Fehninger, Todd; Woolfrey, Ann; Devine, Steven; Ross, Maureen; Waller, Edmund K; Sobecks, Ronald; Parham, Peter; Guethlein, Lisbeth A; Marsh, Steven G E; Miller, Jeffrey.
Afiliação
  • Weisdorf D; Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: weisd001@umn.edu.
  • Cooley S; Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Wang T; Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Trachtenberg E; Children's Hospital of Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California.
  • Haagenson MD; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI & Minneapolis, MN.
  • Vierra-Green C; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI & Minneapolis, MN.
  • Spellman S; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI & Minneapolis, MN.
  • Spahn A; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI & Minneapolis, MN.
  • Vogel J; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI & Minneapolis, MN.
  • Kobusingye H; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Milwaukee, WI & Minneapolis, MN.
  • Fehninger T; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Woolfrey A; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Devine S; Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Ross M; Roswell Park Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
  • Waller EK; Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Sobecks R; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Parham P; Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Guethlein LA; Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Marsh SGE; Anthony Nolan Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom.
  • Miller J; Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 25(1): e28-e32, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149149
ABSTRACT
We previously reported that acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) transplants using killer cell immunoglobulin-type receptor (KIR) B haplotype better or best (≥2 B activating gene loci ± Cen B/B) unrelated donors (URDs) yield less relapse and better survival. In this prospective trial we evaluated 535 AML searches from 14 participating centers with centralized donor KIR genotyping for donor selection. This represented 3% to 48% of all AML searches (median 20%) per center, totaling 3 to 172 patients (median 22) per center. Donor KIR genotype was reported at a median of 14 days after request (≤26 days for 76% of searches). In 535 searches, 2080 donors were requested for KIR genotyping (mean 4.3 per search); and a median of 1.8 (range, 0 to 4.5) per search were KIR typed. Choosing more donors for confirmatory HLA and KIR haplotype identification enriched the likelihood of finding KIR better or best donors. The search process identified a mean of 30% KIR better or best donors; the success ranged from 24% to 38% in the 11 centers enrolling ≥8 patients. More donors requested for KIR genotyping increased the likelihood of identifying KIR better or best haplotype donors. Of the 247 transplants, 9.3% used KIR best, 19% used KIR better, and 48% used KIR neutral donors while 24% used a non-KIR-tested donor. KIR genotyping did not delay transplantation. The time from search to transplant was identical for transplants using a KIR-genotyped versus a non-KIR-genotyped donor. Prospective evaluation can rapidly identify KIR favorable genotype donors, but choosing more donors per search would substantially increase the likelihood of having a KIR best or better donor available for transplantation. Transplant centers and donor registries must both commit extra effort to incorporate new characteristics (beyond HLA, age, and parity) into improved donor selection. Deliberate efforts to present additional genetic factors for donor selection will require novel procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Haplótipos / Leucemia Mieloide Aguda / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Seleção do Doador / Receptores KIR / Doadores não Relacionados Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Haplótipos / Leucemia Mieloide Aguda / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Seleção do Doador / Receptores KIR / Doadores não Relacionados Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article