Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma.
Mariette, C; Carneiro, F; Grabsch, H I; van der Post, R S; Allum, W; de Manzoni, Giovanni.
Afiliação
  • Mariette C; Department of Surgery, Hôpital Claude-Huriez, Lille, France.
  • Carneiro F; Departments of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Faculty of Medicine of Porto University and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (i3S), Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal.
  • Grabsch HI; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van der Post RS; Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Allum W; Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • de Manzoni G; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Gastric Cancer ; 22(1): 1-9, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30167905
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer (GC) are changing, especially in the West with a decreasing incidence of distal, intestinal-type tumours and the corresponding increasing proportion of tumours with Laurén diffuse or WHO poorly cohesive (PC) including signet ring cell (SRC) histology. To accurately assess the behaviour and the prognosis of these GC subtypes, the standardization of pathological definitions is needed. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert team belonging to the European Chapter of International Gastric Cancer Association (IGCA) identified 11 topics on pathological classifications used for PC and SRC GC. The topics were debated during a dedicated Workshop held in Verona in March 2017. Then, through a Delphi method, consensus statements for each topic were elaborated. RESULTS: A consensus was reached on the need to classify gastric carcinoma according to the most recent edition of the WHO classification which is currently WHO 2010. Moreover, to standardize the definition of SRC carcinomas, the proposal that only WHO PC carcinomas with more than 90% poorly cohesive cells having signet ring cell morphology have to be classified as SRC carcinomas was made. All other PC non-SRC types have to be further subdivided into PC carcinomas with SRC component (< 90% but > 10% SRCs) and PC carcinomas not otherwise specified (< 10% SRCs). CONCLUSION: The reported statements clarify some debated topics on pathological classifications used for PC and SRC GC. As such, this consensus classification would allow the generation of evidence on biological and prognostic differences between these GC subtypes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article