Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multimodal Interventional Treatment and Outcomes for Unruptured Arteriovenous Malformations.
Maruyama, Daisuke; Satow, Tetsu; Kataoka, Hiroharu; Mori, Hisae; Hamano, Eika; Orita, Yoji; Eguchi, Seiichiro; Takahashi, Jun C.
Afiliação
  • Maruyama D; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan. d.maru1214@gmail.com.
  • Satow T; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • Kataoka H; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • Mori H; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • Hamano E; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • Orita Y; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • Eguchi S; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • Takahashi JC; Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Acta Neurochir Suppl ; 129: 115-120, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30171323
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to evaluate the selection and outcomes of multimodal interventional treatment for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (uAVMs) in ARUBA-eligible patients in a single institution.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 94 patients with uAVMs treated between 2002 and 2014. They were divided into an intervention group and a conservative group. The primary outcome was defined as the composite of death or symptomatic stroke. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

RESULTS:

The intervention and conservative groups included 75 and 19 patients, respectively, with mean follow-up periods of 59.2 ± 41.6 and 72.8 ± 39.2 months (P = 0.20), among whom the primary outcome occurred in 9 (12.3%) and 3 (17.6%) patients, respectively (P = 0.91). The proportion of patients with an mRS score ≥ 2 at last follow-up was not significantly different between the two groups (6.9% vs. 11.7%). In the intervention group, the incidence of death or stroke was lower and functional outcomes were better among patients with grade I/II AVMs than among patients with grade III AVMs.

CONCLUSION:

For patients with uAVMs, interventional treatment is not inferior to medical treatment alone, and careful selection should be made for patients with grade III AVMs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas / Embolização Terapêutica / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas / Embolização Terapêutica / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article