Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction fails to correct mild patella alta in cases of patellofemoral instability-a case-control study.

PURPOSE: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is the gold standard in patella soft tissue surgery for patellofemoral instability. Although claimed, recent reports indicate that MPFL-R may fail to distalize the patella in mild cases of patella alta. The present study is a retrospective case-control study to compare radiographic patella height between MPFL-R and historical Insall's proximal realignment (IPR) pre- and post-operatively with respect to distalization and assess redislocation rates at a mid-term follow-up. METHODS: Sixty-four patients were age/sex matched (1:1), yielding 32 patients for group 1 MPFL-R (cases) and 32 patients for group 2 IPR (controls). Insall-Salvati, Blackburne-Peel and Caton-Deschamps indices were analyzed for differences pre- and post-operatively. An additional inter-rater reliability analysis was performed by means of intra-class correlation (ICC). Redislocation rates were considered as treatment failures in this study. RESULTS: ICC was excellent for all three patella indices. MPFL-R failed to show significant differences if compared to IPR with respect to distalization in mild stages of patella alta. Moreover, redislocation rates significantly favored MPFL-R (3.1%) over IPR (12.5%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MPFL-R has become a popular option to restore native patellofemoral biomechanics after ligament rupture. However, the procedure's potential to correct concomitant patella alta should not be overestimated and indications considered carefully.