Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PD1/PDL1 inhibitors for the treatment of advanced urothelial bladder cancer.
Stenehjem, David D; Tran, Dao; Nkrumah, Michael A; Gupta, Shilpa.
Afiliação
  • Stenehjem DD; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota.
  • Tran D; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, guptash@umn.edu.
  • Nkrumah MA; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota.
  • Gupta S; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota.
Onco Targets Ther ; 11: 5973-5989, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30275703
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Until recently, systemic chemotherapy was the only option for treating bladder cancer and outcomes remained dismal. After a long gap of no progress for 40 years, immuno-therapy with checkpoint inhibitors (PDL1 and PD1) has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of bladder cancer, with five approved agents to treat platinum-refractory bladder cancer since the first approval of atezolizumab in May 2016.

METHODS:

This review summarizes the most recent data on approved checkpoint inhibitors currently used in management of advanced bladder cancer. Early- and late-phase trials of the five checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) in advanced bladder cancer are reviewed in detail. This review also describes the potential application of PD1/PDL1 inhibitors in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, as well as with radiation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment. The role of PDL1 and tumor-mutation burden and clinical considerations in choosing a particular immunotherapy are also discussed.

RESULTS:

The approved checkpoint inhibitors (PD1 and PDL1 inhibitors) have similar efficacy and safety profiles in metastatic platinum-refractory bladder cancer, but they vary in dose and frequency and cost burden. However, only pembrolizumab has shown superiority over standard chemotherapy in a randomized Phase III setting so far. In addition, in the first-line setting for cisplatin-ineligible patients, both pembrolizumab and atezolizumab are US Food and Drug Administration-approved and well tolerated. There is a lack of consensus on the utility of testing for PDL1 as a predictive biomarker, as patients with no PDL1 expression also derive some clinical benefit. Tumor-mutation burden is another predictive biomarker, but needs further validation.

CONCLUSION:

Immunotherapy has offered a glimmer of hope to patients with bladder cancer. The current landscape is rapidly evolving, with novel immunotherapy-combination trials to improve outcomes further and evaluate predictive biomarkers to help identify patients most likely to benefit from such therapies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article