Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for the detection of oral-pharyngeal pain in critically ill adults.
Dale, Craig M; Prendergast, Virginia; Gélinas, Céline; Rose, Louise.
Afiliação
  • Dale CM; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: craig.dale@utoronto.ca.
  • Prendergast V; Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
  • Gélinas C; Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, CIUSSS Centre-Ouest-Ile-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Rose L; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
J Crit Care ; 48: 334-338, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30286403
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Mechanically ventilated patients experience pain at rest and during daily care procedures. Our objective was to test the reliability and validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) to detect oral-pharyngeal pain in intubated and tracheostomised adults during routine oral care procedures. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Two trained research team members independently observed patients during two non-painful (rest and gentle touch) and three potentially painful (oral suctioning, tooth brushing, and swabbing with a sponge toothette) procedures. Conscious patients were asked if they experienced pain during each procedure (yes/no) and to rate their pain intensity on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale.

RESULTS:

A total of 98 patients, primarily intubated (92.9%) and male (63.3%) participated. Criterion validation was supported by patient self-report of pain during tooth brushing (AUC=.80; P<0.5) and oral suction (AUC=.72; P<0.3) but not for oral swabbing (AUC=.68; P=0.16). Discriminative validation was demonstrated for all oral care procedures compared to rest (P<.001). Intra-class correlation coefficients between raters ranged from .78 to .91 (P<.001) for total CPOT scores, indicating excellent inter-rater reliability.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CPOT is reliable and valid for the detection of oral-pharyngeal pain during oral care procedures indicated as painful by critically ill adults.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medição da Dor / Estado Terminal / Dor Processual Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medição da Dor / Estado Terminal / Dor Processual Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article