Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparison of Simple Analytical Methods for Determination of Fluoride in Microlitre-Volume Plasma Samples.
Zohoori, F Vida; Maguire, Anne; Martinez-Mier, E Angeles; Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo; Sanderson, Roy; Eckert, George J.
Afiliação
  • Zohoori FV; School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom, v.zohoori@tees.ac.uk.
  • Maguire A; Centre for Oral Health Research (COHR), School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
  • Martinez-Mier EA; Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Buzalaf MAR; Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sanderson R; Evidence and Policy Research Group, School of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
  • Eckert GJ; Biostatistician Supervisor in Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Caries Res ; 53(3): 275-283, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30296785
ABSTRACT
The aim was to compare potential methods for fluoride analysis in microlitre-volume plasma samples containing nano-gram amounts of fluoride.

Methods:

A group of 4 laboratories analysed a set of standardised biological samples as well as plasma to determine fluoride concentration using 3 methods. In Phase-1, fluoride analysis was carried out using the established hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS)-diffusion method (1 mL-aliquot/analysis) to obtain preliminary measurement of agreement between the laboratories. In Phase-2, the laboratories analysed the same samples using a micro-diffusion method and known-addition technique with 200 µL-aliquot/analysis. Coefficients of Variation (CVs) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated using analysis of variance to evaluate the amount of variation within- and between-laboratories. Based on the results of the Phase-2 analysis, 20 human plasma samples were analysed and compared using the HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique in Phase-3.

Results:

Comparison of Phase-1 results showed no statistically significant difference among the laboratories for the overall data set. The mean between- and within-laboratory CVs and ICCs were < 0.13 and ≥0.99, respectively, indicating very low variability and excellent reliability. In Phase-2, the overall results for between-laboratory variability showed a poor CV (1.16) and ICC (0.44) for the micro-diffusion method, whereas with the known-addition technique the corresponding values were 0.49 and 0.83. Phase-3 results showed no statistically significant difference in fluoride concentrations of the plasma samples measured with HMDS-diffusion method and known- addition technique, with a mean (SE) difference of 0.002 (0.003) µg/mL. In conclusion, the known-addition technique could be a suitable alternative for the measurement of fluoride in plasma with microlitre-volume samples.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Química do Sangue / Fluoretos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Química do Sangue / Fluoretos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article