Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to endocrine therapy.
Heiney, Sue P; Parker, Pearman D; Felder, Tisha M; Adams, Swann Arp; Omofuma, Omonefe O; Hulett, Jennifer M.
Afiliação
  • Heiney SP; College of Nursing, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, 29208, SC, USA. heineys@mailbox.sc.edu.
  • Parker PD; College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
  • Felder TM; College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
  • Adams SA; College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
  • Omofuma OO; Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
  • Hulett JM; College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 173(3): 499-510, 2019 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30387003
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Adherence to endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer is a significant problem, especially in minority populations. Further, endocrine therapy reduces recurrence and thus mortality. However, little data are available on interventions to improve adherence. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of interventions, strategies, or approaches aimed to improve endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to determine if interventions had any cultural modifications.

METHODS:

Two of the authors examined articles published between 2006 and 2017 from a wide variety of databases using Covidence systematic review platform.

RESULTS:

In total, 16 eligible studies met criteria for review including 4 randomized controlled trials, 4 retrospective studies, and 8 with various observational designs. Eligible studies used a broad range of definitions for adherence and measured adherence by self-report, medical records, claims data, and combinations of these. All used 80% medication possession ratio as a standard for adherence. Patient information/education was the most frequent intervention strategy but did not demonstrate a significant effect except in one study. Significant results were noted when education was combined with communication strategies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Researchers need a standard definition for adherence and a reliable measure that is feasible to use in a variety of studies. While education may be a necessary component of an intervention, when used alone, it is not a sufficient approach to change behavior.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article