Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes with Budesonide plus Formoterol Spiromax for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Real-World, Observational Trial.
Gillissen, Adrian; Gessner, Christian; Hechenbichler, Klaus; Herth, Felix J F; Juenemann, Ralf; Kanniess, Frank; Kardos, Peter; Lommatzsch, Marek; Schneidereit, Regina; Windisch, Wolfram.
Afiliação
  • Gillissen A; Kreiskliniken Reutlingen/Ermstalklinik, Reutlingen-Bad Urach, Germany, gillissen_a@klin-rt.de.
  • Gessner C; POIS Leipzig GbR, Gessner & Gessner, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Hechenbichler K; Institut Dr. Schauerte, Munich, Germany.
  • Herth FJF; Thoraxklink, University of Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Juenemann R; Teva GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Kanniess F; Gemeinschaftspraxis Reinfeld, Reinfeld, Germany.
  • Kardos P; Maingau Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Lommatzsch M; University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Schneidereit R; Teva GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Windisch W; Cologne Merheim Hospital, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Respiration ; 97(4): 292-301, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30391944
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The fixed-dose combination of budesonide/formoterol (B/F) has been available in the Spiromax® dry powder inhaler since 2014.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess patient satisfaction, inhaler use errors, and disease control in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with B/F Spiromax.

METHODS:

This non-interventional, prospective, 12-week study enrolled consecutive asthma or COPD patients who had recently begun treatment with B/F Spiromax or were switched from another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist combination to B/F Spiromax in routine clinical practice. Patients recruited from 243 specialist respiratory clinics or general practices in Germany were assessed for patient satisfaction (Satisfaction with Inhalers and Preference questionnaire), inhaler application errors (modified Easy Low Instruction over Time checklist), disease control, and safety.

RESULTS:

The population included 3,943 patients asthma n = 2,707 (68.7%); COPD n = 1,236 (31.3%). At baseline, 60.1% of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their previous inhaler, and this increased to 88.8% at week 12 of B/F Spiromax use. Overall, 62.1% of pre-treated patients preferred B/F Spiromax to their old inhaler. The frequency of any handling error observed with B/F Spiromax at week 12 was lower than at baseline (11.9 vs. 25.5% of patients, respectively). After 12 weeks, 77.4% were assessed as having improved (minimally, much, or very much) overall health status versus baseline. Guideline-defined disease severity (as rated by physicians) and patient-reported symptom severity improved during the study in both asthma and COPD patients. B/F Spiromax was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION:

B/F Spiromax was associated with high patient satisfaction, low device handling error rate, and improvements in clinical outcomes in real-world clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Combinação Budesonida e Fumarato de Formoterol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Combinação Budesonida e Fumarato de Formoterol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article