Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trapezius Port Placement in Patients with Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up and Quality-of-Life Assessment.
Çil, Barbaros Erhan; Öcal, Osman; Eldem, Fatma Gonca; Peynircioglu, Bora; Balkanci, Ferhun.
Afiliação
  • Çil BE; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 34010, Turkey; Department of Radiology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: bcil@kuh.ku.edu.tr.
  • Öcal O; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 34010, Turkey.
  • Eldem FG; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 34010, Turkey.
  • Peynircioglu B; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 34010, Turkey.
  • Balkanci F; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 34010, Turkey.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(1): 69-73, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527656
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the long-term results of and patient satisfaction with trapezius ports in breast cancer patients, as an alternative to chest ports. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective study included all patients who underwent trapezius port placement from December 2007 to January 2017. Seventy female patients with breast cancer, with a mean age of 54 ± 9.9 years (range, 29-76 years), were included. Indications for trapezius implantation were bilateral breast surgery or unilateral breast surgery and contralateral breast involvement. Sixty-eight of 70 patients had long-term follow-up. A retrospective, questionnaire-based survey was conducted to assess satisfaction and the trapezius port's effect on the daily life of the patient.

RESULTS:

All implantations were technically successful. Total catheter service time for 68 patients was 65,952 days (2 patients were lost to follow-up). Mean catheter service time was 969.8 days (range 7-3,458 days; median 570 days; 95% confidence interval, 739-1199; standard deviation, 947.7). No immediate procedural complications occurred. Port complications developed in 4 patients (5.9%); port infection developed in 2 patients (0.03/1,000 days); skin dehiscence developed in 1 patient (0.02/1,000 days); and port malfunction developed in 1 patient (0.02/1,000 days). The overall infection rate was 2.9% (2/68). All patients (n = 44) or a close relative (n = 17) who were interviewed with a phone call reported satisfaction regarding their ports.

CONCLUSIONS:

Trapezius ports offer a safe and feasible option to patients with breast cancer who need an alternative site to chest ports. It is also associated with high overall patient satisfaction.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Mama / Cateterismo / Cateteres de Demora / Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular / Músculos Superficiais do Dorso / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Mama / Cateterismo / Cateteres de Demora / Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular / Músculos Superficiais do Dorso / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article