Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass?
Candemil, Amanda Pelegrin; Salmon, Benjamin; Freitas, Deborah Queiroz; Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria Bovi; Haiter-Neto, Francisco; Oliveira, Matheus Lima.
Afiliação
  • Candemil AP; 1 Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil.
  • Salmon B; 2 Orofacial Pathologies, Imaging and Biotherapies Lab and Dental Medicine Department, Bretonneau Hospital, HUPNVS, AP-HP, Paris Descartes University - Sorbonne Paris Cité , Paris , France.
  • Freitas DQ; 1 Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil.
  • Ambrosano GMB; 3 Department of Community Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil.
  • Haiter-Neto F; 1 Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil.
  • Oliveira ML; 1 Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 48(3): 20180290, 2019 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30540919
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of metal artefact reduction (MAR) in cone beam CT (CBCT) artefacts arising from metallic objects in the exomass. A radiographic phantom composed of 16 polypropylene tubes filled with a homogeneous radiopaque solution was created. CBCT scans were obtained with two units Picasso Trio (Vatech, South Korea) and ProMax (Planmeca, Finland). The phantom was centred in a 5 × 5 cm field-of-view (FOV) with titanium and CoCr inserts in the exomass. All scans were repeated after enabling MAR. Mean voxel values were obtained from the 16 tubes and standard deviation was calculated as a way of measuring voxel value variability. Mean values and voxel value variability were compared individually in the presence and absence of MAR by means of analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). In the Picasso Trio, MAR significantly decreased mean voxel values (p ≤ 0.05) and increased voxel value variability (p > 0.05) in the presence of titanium. When CoCr was present, no statistical difference (p > 0.05) was observed. In the ProMax, MAR increased significantly mean voxel values (p ≤ 0.05) in the presence of titanium, and presented no significant difference (p > 0.05) for CoCr. Voxel value variability did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) for both materials. In conclusion, MAR was not effective to correct CBCT artefacts arising from metallic objects in the exomass in the two CBCT units used.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Artefatos / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Artefatos / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article