Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of wiping methods for the removal of cleaning agent residue from hair follicles.
Aoki, Miku; Ogai, Kazuhiro; Matsumoto, Masaru; Susa, Haruka; Yamada, Kotoko; Yamatake, Takafumi; Kobayashi, Masato; Sugama, Junko.
Afiliação
  • Aoki M; Department of Clinical Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Ogai K; Wellness Promotion Science Center, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Matsumoto M; Department of Imaging Nursing Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Susa H; Nagahama City Hospital, Nagahama, Japan.
  • Yamada K; Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Yamatake T; Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Kobayashi M; Wellness Promotion Science Center, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Sugama J; Advanced Health Care Science Research Unit, Innovative Integrated Bio-Research Core, Institute for Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Skin Res Technol ; 25(3): 355-358, 2019 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30604560
PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the influence of different wiping methods on cleaning agent residue in hair follicles when using skin cleaning agents that are "removable-by-wiping." METHODS: A total of 18 male volunteers were recruited and a cleaning agent containing 10% fluorescein sodium salt (cleaning agent) was used in this study. After gentle washing, the cleaning agent was removed via the washing method (control) or three distinct wiping methods (experiment). Hairs were obtained from the measurement area. The fluorescence intensities of the residual cleaning agent on the hair root and hair bulb were then evaluated after normalizing for autofluorescence from the hair. Fluorescence intensity was used to estimate the amount of cleaning agent residue. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among cleaning agent removal methods (hair root: P = 0.67, hair bulb: P = 0.62) with respect to the amount of residual cleaning agent on hair. CONCLUSION: Cleaning agent residual index did not differ according to removal method. Cleaning agent remained in the hair follicle (hair roots, hair bulbs) despite removal from the skin by washing or wiping. Further studies are required to apply "removable-by-wiping" cleaning agents for people with vulnerable skin.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Higiene da Pele / Folículo Piloso / Fármacos Dermatológicos / Detergentes Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Higiene da Pele / Folículo Piloso / Fármacos Dermatológicos / Detergentes Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article