Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rapid Multiscale Computational Screening for OLED Host Materials.
Sylvinson M R, Daniel; Chen, Hsiao-Fan; Martin, Lauren M; Saris, Patrick J G; Thompson, Mark E.
Afiliação
  • Sylvinson M R D; Department of Chemistry , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California 90089 , United States.
  • Chen HF; Department of Chemistry , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California 90089 , United States.
  • Martin LM; Department of Chemistry , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California 90089 , United States.
  • Saris PJG; Department of Chemistry , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California 90089 , United States.
  • Thompson ME; Department of Chemistry , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California 90089 , United States.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 11(5): 5276-5288, 2019 Feb 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640428
ABSTRACT
The design of new host materials for phosphorescent organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) is challenging because several physical property requirements must be met simultaneously. A triplet energy ( ET) higher than that of the chosen emitting dopant, appropriate highest occupied molecular orbital/lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy levels, good charge carrier transport, and high stability are all required. Here, computational methods were used to screen structures to find the most promising candidates for OLED hosts. The screening was carried out in three Tiers. The Tier 1 selection, based on density functional theory calculations, identified a set of eight molecular structures with ET > 2.9 eV, suitable for hosting blue phosphorescent dopants such as iridium(III)bis((4,6-di-fluorophenyl)-pyridinato-N,C2')picolinate. Phenanthro[9,10- d]imidazole was chosen as the starting point for the Tier 2 selection. Thirty-seven unique molecular structures were enumerated by isoelectronic nitrogen transmutation of up to two CH fragments of the phenanthrene. Three molecules, that is, imidazo[4,5- f]-phenanthrolines with nitrogens at the 1,10-, 3,8-, and 4,7-positions, were selected for Tier 3, which involved the use of molecular dynamics simulations and electron coupling calculations to predict differences in charge transport between the three materials. The three were explored experimentally through synthesis and device fabrication. The singlet, triplet, and frontier orbital energies computed using single-molecule density functional theory calculations ( Tiers 1 and 2) were consistent with the experimental values in a fluid solution, and the multiscale modeling scheme ( Tier 3) correctly predicted the poor device performance of one material. We conclude that screening host materials using only single-molecule quantum mechanical data was not sufficient to predict whether a given material would make a good OLED host with certainty; however, they can be used to screen out materials that are destined to fail due to low singlet/triplet energies or a poor match of the frontier orbital energies to the dopant or transport materials.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article