Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in adults with spinal cord injury in Taiwan: a psychometric study.
Chiu, Tzu-Ying; Finger, Monika E; Fellinghauer, Carolina S; Escorpizo, Reuben; Chi, Wen-Chou; Liou, Tsan-Hon; Yen, Chia-Feng.
Afiliação
  • Chiu TY; Graduate Institute of Long-term Care, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien, Taiwan.
  • Finger ME; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
  • Fellinghauer CS; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
  • Escorpizo R; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
  • Chi WC; Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.
  • Liou TH; School of Occupational Therapy, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Yen CF; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Spinal Cord ; 57(6): 516-524, 2019 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30643169
STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric study including exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to examine the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in terms of its dimensionality and metric properties in a sample of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Two hundred and thirty-nine hospitals in Taiwan METHODS: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the National Disability Determination System in Taiwan, including data of individuals with more than 1-year chronic spinal cord injury and over 18 years of age. We would ask the all 6 domains of WHODAS 2.0, except those participants who were not working in present, based on the WHODAS 2.0 manual. RESULTS: Data from 521 persons were included. The internal consistency of WHODAS 2.0 was high for all six domains (Cronbach's α between 0.87-0.99). The exploratory factor analysis supported the original six domain structure of WHODAS 2.0 to a large extent. Rasch analysis provided domain scores usable for measurement at the individual level and an overall WHODAS 2.0 score that takes into account the multidimensionality of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: WHODAS 2.0 provides a reliable and valid instrument to measure relevant aspects of "activity and participation" in the context of functioning in people with SCI in Taiwan and may guide their rehabilitation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Traumatismos da Medula Espinal / Organização Mundial da Saúde / Avaliação da Deficiência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Traumatismos da Medula Espinal / Organização Mundial da Saúde / Avaliação da Deficiência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article