Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Knowledge and practice of colorectal cancer screening in an urban setting: cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians in government clinics in Malaysia.
Ooi, Chor Yau; Hanafi, Nik Sherina; Liew, Su May.
Afiliação
  • Ooi CY; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia.
  • Hanafi NS; University of Malaya Primary Care Research Group, Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Liew SM; University of Malaya Primary Care Research Group, Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Singapore Med J ; 60(11): 596-604, 2019 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30644527
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) was the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide in 2008 (1.23 million cases, 9.7%). CRC screening was shown to be effective in reducing 70% of CRC mortality. However, the screening rate for CRC remains poor.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among primary care physicians (PCPs) in public primary care clinics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. A 30-item self-administered questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge and practice of CRC screening.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 86.4% (n = 197/228). Less than half (39.1%) of the respondents answered correctly for all risk stratification scenarios. Mean knowledge score on CRC screening modalities was 48.7% ± 17.7%. The knowledge score was positively associated with having postgraduate educational qualification and usage of screening guidelines. Overall, 69.9% of PCPs reported that they practised screening. However, of these, only 25.9% of PCPs screened over 50% of all eligible patients. PCPs who agreed that screening was cost-effective (odds ratio [OR] 3.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69‒6.59) and those who agreed that they had adequate resources in their locality (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.01‒3.68) were more likely to practise screening. Knowledge score was not associated with the practice of screening (p = 0.185).

CONCLUSION:

Knowledge and practice of CRC screening was inadequate among PCPs. Knowledge of screening did not translate into its practice. PCPs' perceptions about cost-effectiveness of screening and adequate resources were important determinants of the practice of screening.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Neoplasias Colorretais / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Centros Comunitários de Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Médicos de Atenção Primária Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Neoplasias Colorretais / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Centros Comunitários de Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Médicos de Atenção Primária Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article