Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis in the BWeL trial.
Retat, Lise; Pimpin, Laura; Webber, Laura; Jaccard, Abbygail; Lewis, Amanda; Tearne, Sarah; Hood, Kathryn; Christian-Brown, Anna; Adab, Peymane; Begh, Rachna; Jolly, Kate; Daley, Amanda; Farley, Amanda; Lycett, Deborah; Nickless, Alecia; Yu, Ly-Mee; Jebb, Susan; Aveyard, Paul.
Afiliação
  • Retat L; UK Health Forum, Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX, UK.
  • Pimpin L; UK Health Forum, Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX, UK.
  • Webber L; UK Health Forum, Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX, UK.
  • Jaccard A; UK Health Forum, Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX, UK.
  • Lewis A; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
  • Tearne S; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Hood K; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
  • Christian-Brown A; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Adab P; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Begh R; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Jolly K; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Daley A; School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Ashby Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.
  • Farley A; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Lycett D; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK.
  • Nickless A; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Yu LM; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Jebb S; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
  • Aveyard P; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. paul.aveyard@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 43(10): 2066-2075, 2019 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30705390
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Brief Intervention for Weight Loss Trial enrolled 1882 consecutively attending primary care patients who were obese and participants were randomised to physicians opportunistically endorsing, offering, and facilitating a referral to a weight loss programme (support) or recommending weight loss (advice). After one year, the support group lost 1.4 kg more (95%CI 0.9 to 2.0) 2.4 kg versus 1.0 kg. We use a cohort simulation to predict effects on disease incidence, quality of life, and healthcare costs over 20 years.

METHODS:

Randomly sampling from the trial population, we created a virtual cohort of 20 million adults and assigned baseline morbidity. We applied the weight loss observed in the trial and assumed weight regain over four years. Using epidemiological data, we assigned the incidence of 12 weight-related diseases depending on baseline disease status, age, gender, body mass index. From a healthcare perspective, we calculated the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) accruing and calculated the incremental difference between trial arms in costs expended in delivering the intervention and healthcare costs accruing. We discounted future costs and benefits at 1.5% over 20 years.

RESULTS:

Compared with advice, the support intervention reduced the cumulative incidence of weight-related disease by 722/100,000 people, 0.33% of all weight-related disease. The incremental cost of support over advice was £2.01million/100,000. However, the support intervention reduced health service costs by £5.86 million/100,000 leading to a net saving of £3.85 million/100,000. The support intervention produced 992 QALYs/100,000 people relative to advice.

CONCLUSIONS:

A brief intervention in which physicians opportunistically endorse, offer, and facilitate a referral to a behavioural weight management service to patients with a BMI of at least 30 kg/m2 reduces healthcare costs and improves health more than advising weight loss.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Programas de Rastreamento / Programas de Redução de Peso / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Programas de Rastreamento / Programas de Redução de Peso / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article