National trends in cerebral bypass for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample analysis of 1998-2015.
Neurosurg Focus
; 46(2): E15, 2019 02 01.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30717045
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVEThe development and recent widespread dissemination of flow diverters may have reduced the utilization of surgical bypass procedures to treat complex or giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to observe trends in cerebral revascularization procedures for UIAs in the United States before and after the introduction of flow diverters by using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS).METHODSThe authors extracted data from the NIS database for the years 1998-2015 using the ICD-9/10 diagnostic and procedure codes. Patients with a primary diagnosis of UIA with a concurrent bypass procedure were included in the study. Outcomes and hospital charges were analyzed.RESULTSA total of 216,212 patients had a primary diagnosis of UIA during the study period. The number of patients diagnosed with a UIA increased by 128% from 1998 (n = 7718) to 2015 (n = 17,600). Only 1328 of the UIA patients (0.6%) underwent cerebral bypass. The percentage of patients who underwent bypass in the flow diverter era (2010-2015) remained stable at 0.4%. Most patients who underwent bypass were white (51%), were female (62%), had a median household income in the 3rd or 4th quartiles (57%), and had private insurance (51%). The West (33%) and Midwest/North Central regions (30%) had the highest volume of bypasses, whereas the Northeast region had the lowest (15%). Compared to the period 1998-2011, bypass procedures for UIAs in 2012-2015 shifted entirely to urban teaching hospitals (100%) and to an elective basis (77%). The median hospital stay (9 vs 3 days, p < 0.0001), median hospital charges ($186,746 vs $66,361, p < 0.0001), and rate of any complication (51% vs 17%, p < 0.0001) were approximately threefold higher for the UIA patients with bypass than for those without bypass.CONCLUSIONSDespite a significant increase in the diagnosis of UIAs over the 17-year study period, the proportion of bypass procedures performed as part of their treatment has remained stable. Therefore, advances in endovascular aneurysm therapy do not appear to have affected the volume of bypass procedures performed in the UIA population. The authors' findings suggest a potentially ongoing niche for bypass procedures in the contemporary treatment of UIAs.
Palavras-chave
FDA = Food and Drug Administration; ICD = International Classification of Diseases; NIS = National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample; National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample; PED = Pipeline embolization device; UIA = unruptured intracranial aneurysm; US = United States; cerebral revascularization; national trends; unruptured aneurysms
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Aneurisma Intracraniano
/
Revascularização Cerebral
/
Interpretação Estatística de Dados
/
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde
/
Tempo de Internação
Tipo de estudo:
Etiology_studies
/
Incidence_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Child
/
Child, preschool
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Infant
/
Male
País como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article