Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving the quality of clinical research on chronic wound infection treatment: expert-based recommendations.
Pomponio, Giovanni; Tedesco, Silvia; Peghetti, Angela; Bianchi, Tommaso; Rowan, Sara; Greco, Alessandro; Cutting, Keith; Price, Patricia; Moore, Zena; Gabrielli, Armando; Wolcott, Randall.
Afiliação
  • Pomponio G; Clinica Medica, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Italy.
  • Tedesco S; SOSD Fibrosi Cistica, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Italy.
  • Peghetti A; Ospedale S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, former AISLeC President, Executive Board of World Union of Wound Healing Societies, Italy.
  • Bianchi T; UO Dermatologia AUSL Bologna - Istituto delle scienze neurologiche Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.
  • Rowan S; C3S - Clinical Scientific Support Services, Italy.
  • Greco A; Outpatient Wound Care Centre, Local Health Care System Frosinone, Italy.
  • Cutting K; Clinical Research Consultant, Hertfordshire, Tissue Viability Specialist, First Community Health and Care, Surrey, UK.
  • Price P; Emeritus Professor; c/o Pro Vice-Chancellors' Office, Cardiff University, UK.
  • Moore Z; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; and Visiting Professor, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UGent, Ghent University, Belgium.
  • Gabrielli A; Professor; Clinica Medica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
  • Wolcott R; Southwest Regional Wound Care Center, Lubbock, Texas, US.
J Wound Care ; 28(Sup1): S26-S31, 2019 Jan 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30724117
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To produce recommendations for the design of reliable and informative clinical investigations in chronic wound infection.

METHOD:

A multidisciplinary panel of international experts from four countries (Italy, UK, Ireland and the US) were involved in a detailed, semi-structured discussion on how to better select and describe a target population, interventions and outcomes, and which infection-related criteria to apply in order to achieve a high-quality trial. Consent among the experts was measured using the Delphi method and GRADE Working Group suggestions. The project was fully supported by AISLeC 2016 (Italian Nursing Society for Wound Care Study).

RESULTS:

In total, 37 recommendations achieved substantial agreement among the experts; 10 concerned the most appropriate description and selection of a target population, four related to interventions and 15 to outcomes. A further eight statements about critical methodological points were approved.

CONCLUSION:

Developing recommendations in a systematic manner through a representative group of experts could generate tools for improving the design of clinical trials in this challenging area.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção dos Ferimentos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Dermatologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção dos Ferimentos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Dermatologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article