Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MR Imaging Properties of ex vivo Common Marmoset Brain after Formaldehyde Fixation.
Haga, Yawara; Hata, Junichi; Uematsu, Akiko; Seki, Fumiko; Komaki, Yuji; Mizumura, Mai; Nishio, Marin; Kaneko, Takaaki; Kishi, Noriyuki; Okano, Hideyuki; Furukawa, Akira.
Afiliação
  • Haga Y; Department of Radiological Sciences, Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University Graduate School.
  • Hata J; Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine.
  • Uematsu A; Laboratory for Marmoset Neural Architecture, Center for Brain Science, RIKEN.
  • Seki F; Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine.
  • Komaki Y; Laboratory for Marmoset Neural Architecture, Center for Brain Science, RIKEN.
  • Mizumura M; Live Imaging Center, Central Institute for Experimental Animals.
  • Nishio M; Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine.
  • Kaneko T; Laboratory for Marmoset Neural Architecture, Center for Brain Science, RIKEN.
  • Kishi N; Live Imaging Center, Central Institute for Experimental Animals.
  • Okano H; Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine.
  • Furukawa A; Laboratory for Marmoset Neural Architecture, Center for Brain Science, RIKEN.
Magn Reson Med Sci ; 18(4): 253-259, 2019 Oct 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30726800
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Ex vivo brains have different MRI properties than in vivo brains because of chemical changes caused by fixative solutions, which change the signal intensity and/or tissue contrast on MR images. In this study, we investigated and compared the MRI properties of in vivo and ex vivo brains.

METHODS:

Using a Bruker 9.4T experimental scanner unit for animals (Biospin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany), we performed this study on the common marmoset. We measured the relaxation and diffusion values in the white matter and cortex of common marmosets and compared these values between in vivo brains (n = 20) and ex vivo brains (n = 20). Additionally, we observed the relationship between the tissue fixation duration and MRI properties by imaging a brain that underwent long-term fixation in a preliminary examination (n = 1).

RESULTS:

The T1 values of ex vivo brains were decreased compared with those of in vivo brains; however, there were no significant difference in the T2 and T2* values of in vivo and ex vivo brains. Axial, radial, and mean diffusivity values of ex vivo brains decreased to approximately 65% and 52% of those of in vivo brains in the cortex and white matter, respectively. Conversely, fractional anisotropy values were not significantly different between in vivo and ex vivo brains.

CONCLUSION:

The T1 values and diffusion coefficient values of the ex vivo brains were strikingly different than those of the in vivo brains. Conversely, there were no significant changes in the T2, T2* or fractional anisotropy values. Altogether, the dehydration caused by tissue fixation and the reduction in brain temperature were involved in changing the relaxation and diffusion coefficient values. Here, it was difficult to specify all factors causing these changes. Further detailed study is needed to examine changes in MRI properties.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Fixação de Tecidos / Formaldeído Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Fixação de Tecidos / Formaldeído Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article