Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oophorectomy and risk of contralateral breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Kotsopoulos, Joanne; Lubinski, Jan; Lynch, Henry T; Tung, Nadine; Armel, Susan; Senter, Leigha; Singer, Christian F; Fruscio, Robert; Couch, Fergus; Weitzel, Jeffrey N; Karlan, Beth; Foulkes, William D; Moller, Pal; Eisen, Andrea; Ainsworth, Peter; Neuhausen, Susan L; Olopade, Olufunmilayo; Sun, Ping; Gronwald, Jacek; Narod, Steven A.
Afiliação
  • Kotsopoulos J; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
  • Lubinski J; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Lynch HT; International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
  • Tung N; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
  • Armel S; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Senter L; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Singer CF; Division of Human Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Fruscio R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Couch F; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  • Weitzel JN; Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Karlan B; Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Foulkes WD; Gynecology Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Moller P; Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Eisen A; Inherited Cancer Research Group, Department for Medical Genetics, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Ainsworth P; Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Neuhausen SL; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Olopade O; Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, Department of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Sun P; Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Gronwald J; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
  • Narod SA; International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 175(2): 443-449, 2019 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30756284
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Following a diagnosis of breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers face an increased risk of developing a second (contralateral) cancer in the unaffected breast. It is important to identify predictors of contralateral cancer in order to make informed decisions about bilateral mastectomy. The impact of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (i.e., oophorectomy) on the risk of developing contralateral breast cancer is unclear. Thus, we conducted a prospective study of the relationship between oophorectomy and the risk of contralateral breast cancer in 1781 BRCA1 and 503 BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer.

METHODS:

Women were followed from the date of diagnosis of their first breast cancer until the date of diagnosis of a contralateral breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy, date of death, or date of last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of contralateral breast cancer associated with oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was included as a time-dependent covariate. We performed a left-censored analysis for those women who reported a primary breast cancer prior to study entry (i.e., from completion of baseline questionnaire).

RESULTS:

After an average of 9.8 years of follow-up, there were 179 (7.8%) contralateral breast cancers diagnosed. Oophorectomy was not associated with the risk of developing a second breast cancer (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.68-1.25). The relationship did not vary by BRCA mutation type or by age at diagnosis of the first breast cancer. There was some evidence for a decreased risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with an ER-positive primary breast cancer, but this was based on a small number of events (n = 240).

CONCLUSION:

Overall, our findings suggest that oophorectomy has little impact on the risk of contralateral breast cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ovário / Neoplasias da Mama / Proteína BRCA1 / Proteína BRCA2 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ovário / Neoplasias da Mama / Proteína BRCA1 / Proteína BRCA2 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article