Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of the MasSpec Pen for Rapid Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.
Sans, Marta; Zhang, Jialing; Lin, John Q; Feider, Clara L; Giese, Noah; Breen, Michael T; Sebastian, Katherine; Liu, Jinsong; Sood, Anil K; Eberlin, Livia S.
Afiliação
  • Sans M; Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Zhang J; Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Lin JQ; Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Feider CL; Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Giese N; Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Breen MT; Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Sebastian K; Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Liu J; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Sood AK; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, and the Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNA, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Eberlin LS; Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX; liviase@utexas.edu.
Clin Chem ; 65(5): 674-683, 2019 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30770374
BACKGROUND: Accurate tissue diagnosis during ovarian cancer surgery is critical to maximize cancer excision and define treatment options. Yet, current methods for intraoperative tissue evaluation can be time intensive and subjective. We have developed a handheld and biocompatible device coupled to a mass spectrometer, the MasSpec Pen, which uses a discrete water droplet for molecular extraction and rapid tissue diagnosis. Here we evaluated the performance of this technology for ovarian cancer diagnosis across different sample sets, tissue types, and mass spectrometry systems. METHODS: MasSpec Pen analyses were performed on 192 ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneum tissue samples. Samples were evaluated by expert pathologists to confirm diagnosis. Performance using an Orbitrap and a linear ion trap mass spectrometer was tested. Statistical models were generated using machine learning and evaluated using validation and test sets. RESULTS: High performance for high-grade serous carcinoma (n = 131; clinical sensitivity, 96.7%; specificity, 95.7%) and overall cancer (n = 138; clinical sensitivity, 94.0%; specificity, 94.4%) diagnoses was achieved using Orbitrap data. Variations in the mass spectra from normal tissue, low-grade, and high-grade serous ovarian cancers were observed. Discrimination between cancer and fallopian tube or peritoneum tissues was also achieved with accuracies of 92.6% and 87.9%, respectively, and 100% clinical specificity for both. Using ion trap data, excellent results for high-grade serous cancer vs normal ovarian differentiation (n = 40; clinical sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: The MasSpec Pen, together with machine learning, provides robust molecular models for ovarian serous cancer prediction and thus has potential for clinical use for rapid and accurate ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Espectrometria de Massas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Espectrometria de Massas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article