Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics of functional movement screening testing in elite handball players: Indicative data from the 9.
Rafnsson, E T; Myklebust, G; Bahr, R; Valdimarsson, Ö; Frohm, A; Árnason, Á.
Afiliação
  • Rafnsson ET; Research Centre of Movement Science, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; Orkuhusid, Physical Therapy and Medical Centre, Reykjavik, Iceland. Electronic address: elis@sjukratjalfun.is.
  • Myklebust G; Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
  • Bahr R; Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
  • Valdimarsson Ö; Orkuhusid, Physical Therapy and Medical Centre, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Frohm A; Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society (NVS) Division of Physical Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
  • Árnason Á; Research Centre of Movement Science, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; Gáski Physical Therapy, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Phys Ther Sport ; 37: 15-20, 2019 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802761
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To test 9 + screening batterie's intra-rater reliability, to provide indicative data of elite handball players, and to analyze difference between age, playing positions and level of play.

DESIGN:

Descriptive study.

SETTING:

Icelandic elite male handball players.

PARTICIPANTS:

182 elite male handball players. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Nine + screening battery.

RESULTS:

Reliability test Intra-class correlation for the total score was 0.95. The correlation of each of the test factors varied from 0.63 to 0.91. The mean total score was 22.3 ±â€¯2.9 (95%CI 16.7-28.1), with no difference in total score comparing players age or level of play. Goalkeepers displayed a higher total score than other players (F3,151 = 5.75, p = 0.001). Junior players had a lower score than senior players in tests measuring abdominal strength and core stability; Test 5; │2(3, 182) = 41.5, p < 0.0001, Test 6; │2(3, 182) = 55.7, p < 0.0001, Test 7; │2(3, 182) = 11.8, p < 0.005, but higher scores in tests measuring trunk and shoulder mobility Test 8; │2(3, 182) = 18.2, p < 0.0001, Test 9; │2(3, 182) = 22.2, p = 0.006.

CONCLUSIONS:

The 9+ intra-rater reliability was acceptable for the total score and individual tests. Age-related differences were provided in many individual tests.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esportes / Teste de Esforço / Movimento Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esportes / Teste de Esforço / Movimento Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article