Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org.
Hooson Jzh, Jozef; Hutchinson Jyh, Jayne; Warthon-Medina, Marisol; Hancock, Neil; Greathead, Katharine; Knowles, Bethany; Vargas-Garcia, Elisa; Gibson, Lauren E; Bush, Linda A; Margetts, Barrie; Robinson, Sian; Ness, Andy; Alwan, Nisreen A; Wark, Petra A; Roe, Mark; Finglas, Paul; Steer, Toni; Page, Polly; Johnson, Laura; Roberts, Katharine; Amoutzopoulos, Birdem; Burley, Victoria J; Greenwood, Darren C; Cade, Janet E.
Afiliação
  • Hooson Jzh J; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Hutchinson Jyh J; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Warthon-Medina M; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Hancock N; Food Databanks National Capability, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK.
  • Greathead K; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Knowles B; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Vargas-Garcia E; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Gibson LE; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Bush LA; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Margetts B; Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Robinson S; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Ness A; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Alwan NA; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton & University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Wark PA; NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Roe M; NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Finglas P; Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
  • Steer T; Centre for Innovative Research Across the Life Course (CIRAL), Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
  • Page P; Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Johnson L; Food Databanks National Capability, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK.
  • Roberts K; EuroFIR AISBL, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Amoutzopoulos B; Food Databanks National Capability, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK.
  • Burley VJ; MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
  • Greenwood DC; MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
  • Cade JE; Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 60(8): 1265-1289, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30882230
ABSTRACT

Background:

Health researchers may struggle to choose suitable validated dietary assessment tools (DATs) for their target population. The aim of this review was to identify and collate information on validated UK DATs and validation studies for inclusion on a website to support researchers to choose appropriate DATs.

Design:

A systematic review of reviews of DATs was undertaken. DATs validated in UK populations were extracted from the studies identified. A searchable website was designed to display these data. Additionally, mean differences and limits of agreement between test and comparison methods were summarized by a method, weighting by sample size.

Results:

Over 900 validation results covering 5 life stages, 18 nutrients, 6 dietary assessment methods, and 9 validation method types were extracted from 63 validated DATs which were identified from 68 reviews. These were incorporated into www.nutritools.org. Limits of agreement were determined for about half of validations. Thirty four DATs were FFQs. Only 17 DATs were validated against biomarkers, and only 19 DATs were validated in infant/children/adolescents.

Conclusions:

The interactive www.nutritools.org website holds extensive validation data identified from this review and can be used to guide researchers to critically compare and choose a suitable DAT for their research question, leading to improvement of nutritional epidemiology research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisadores / Avaliação Nutricional / Internet / Dieta Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisadores / Avaliação Nutricional / Internet / Dieta Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article