Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?
Clayton, Bethanne C; Tinius, Rachel A; Winchester, Lee J; Menke, Brenna R; Reece, Michelle C; Maples, Jill M.
Afiliação
  • Clayton BC; School of Kinesiology, Recreation and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
  • Tinius RA; School of Kinesiology, Recreation and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
  • Winchester LJ; Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
  • Menke BR; School of Kinesiology, Recreation and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
  • Reece MC; Department of Public Health, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
  • Maples JM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci ; 12(4): 245-255, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30899349
ABSTRACT
High-intensity circuit training (HICT) using body weight as resistance is a popular fitness trend and an ideal exercise modality in terms of functionality and economy. Given the popularity of HICT, evidence suggests that sex may elicit unique physiological and perceptual responses to this mode of exercise and there is a need for further work in this area. The purpose of this study was to examine physiological and perceptual responses of females and males to HICT using body weight resistance exercise. Forty-five participants (23 females and 22 males) completed baseline testing and a 15-minute HICT exercise bout wearing a portable metabolic analyzer. %VO2max, %HRmax, and RER were monitored during exercise and analyzed at 3 different 5-minute time segments during the HICT (beginning, middle, end). RPE was assessed half-way through the circuit (7.5), immediately upon cessation of exercise (15), and 15-minutes post-exercise (Session RPE). There was a significant (p<0.01) time effect on %VO2max, %HRmax, RER, and RPE. At all three time points, %VO2max was significantly (p<0.02) higher among females compared to males. RER values were significantly (p=0.02) higher among females during the last 5-minute segment (i.e. the end) of the exercise bout. However there were no differences in %HRmax (p>0.20). Males reported a higher RPE immediately post-exercise compared to females (p=0.01). Taken together, these data suggest that there are distinct, sex-specific physiological and perceptual responses to HICT; thus, sex-specific exercise prescription considerations are warranted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article