Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
When Are Adverse Outcome Pathways and Associated Assays "Fit for Purpose" for Regulatory Decision-Making and Management of Chemicals?
Coady, Katie; Browne, Patience; Embry, Michelle; Hill, Thomas; Leinala, Eeva; Steeger, Thomas; Maslankiewicz, Lidka; Hutchinson, Tom.
Afiliação
  • Coady K; Toxicology & Environmental Research & Consulting, Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA.
  • Browne P; Environment, Health and Safety Division, Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic and Cooperative Development, Paris, France.
  • Embry M; Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Hill T; US Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
  • Leinala E; Environment, Health and Safety Division, Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic and Cooperative Development, Paris, France.
  • Steeger T; US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC.
  • Maslankiewicz L; National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Safety of Substances and Products, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Hutchinson T; University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 15(4): 633-647, 2019 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30908812
There have been increasing demands for chemical hazard and risk assessments in recent years. Chemical companies have expanded internal product stewardship initiatives, and jurisdictions have increased the regulatory requirements for the manufacture and sale of chemicals. There has also been a shift in chemical toxicity evaluations within the same time frame, with new methodologies being developed to improve chemical safety assessments for both human health and the environment. With increased needs for chemical assessments coupled with more diverse data streams from new technologies, regulators and others tasked with chemical management activities are faced with increasing workloads and more diverse types of data to consider. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework can be applied in different scenarios to integrate data and guide chemical assessment and management activities. In this paper, scenarios of how AOPs can be used to guide chemical management decisions during research and development, chemical registration, and subsequent regulatory activities such as prioritization and risk assessment are considered. Furthermore, specific criteria (e.g., the type and level of AOP complexity, confidence in the AOP, as well as external review and assay validation) are proposed to examine whether AOPs and associated tools are fit for purpose when applied in different contexts. Certain toxicity pathways are recommended as priority areas for AOP research and development, and the continued use of AOPs and defined approaches in regulatory activities are recommended. Furthermore, a call for increased outreach, education, and enhanced use of AOP databases is proposed to increase their utility in chemicals management. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;15:633-647. © 2019 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substâncias Perigosas / Regulamentação Governamental / Ecotoxicologia / Política Ambiental / Rotas de Resultados Adversos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substâncias Perigosas / Regulamentação Governamental / Ecotoxicologia / Política Ambiental / Rotas de Resultados Adversos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article