Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using a checklist to assess if a child undergoing MRI needs general anaesthesia.
Sum, M Y; Ong, Y Z; Low, S X K; Lye, W K; Tang, P H.
Afiliação
  • Sum MY; Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Imaging, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, 229899, Singapore.
  • Ong YZ; Duke NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, 169857, Singapore.
  • Low SXK; Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Imaging, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, 229899, Singapore.
  • Lye WK; Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, 169857, Singapore.
  • Tang PH; Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Imaging, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, 229899, Singapore. Electronic address: tang.phua.hwee@singhealth.com.sg.
Clin Radiol ; 74(6): 488.e17-488.e23, 2019 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30954235
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To assess if a child-assessment checklist covering tasks children are expected to perform during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can determine whether the child requires general anaesthesia (GA) during MRI. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this institute review board approved study, children who underwent MRI from September 2016 to June 2017 at KK Women's and Children's Hospital were assessed using a checklist by a research assistant before their examination. During this project, the checklist had no influence on whether the MRI was performed under GA or not. The checklist consisted of five items rated on a binary scale assessing the child's behaviour. Binary logistic regression was performed separately on the overall sample and for a subset of younger children to identify variables associated with the requirement for GA.

RESULTS:

The mean age of the overall sample (798 children) and the subset of children <8 years (124 children) were 11.7±3.7 and 5.5±1.3 years, respectively. In both groups, children who required GA were significantly younger than those who did not (p<0.001). No gender differences were observed. Children who required GA scored higher on the checklist compared to those who did not in both groups (p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the checklist was found to be good (area under the curve [AUC]=0.97 for both groups), with a suggested cut-off score of 4. Intraclass correlation coefficient of the ratings by two independent individuals was 0.78.

CONCLUSION:

The child assessment checklist was useful in identifying GA requirement in children undergoing MRI and can be administered by non-medical staff with good inter-rater reliability.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Comportamento Infantil / Lista de Checagem / Anestesia Geral Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Comportamento Infantil / Lista de Checagem / Anestesia Geral Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article