Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of telephone genetic counselling to facilitate germline BRCA1/2 testing in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Tutty, Erin; Petelin, Lara; McKinley, Joanne; Young, Mary-Anne; Meiser, Bettina; Rasmussen, Victoria M; Forbes Shepherd, Rowan; James, Paul A; Forrest, Laura E.
Afiliação
  • Tutty E; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Petelin L; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • McKinley J; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Young MA; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Meiser B; Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
  • Rasmussen VM; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Forbes Shepherd R; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • James PA; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Forrest LE; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 27(8): 1186-1196, 2019 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30962500
ABSTRACT
Systemic healthcare issues and geographical challenges restrict women's access to BRCA1/2 testing to inform the use of tailored treatments for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Consequently, BRCA1/2 testing in this population is low and improved testing pathways are urgently needed. This study aimed to determine the acceptability and feasibility of telephone genetic counselling (TGC) to facilitate treatment-focused BRCA1/2 testing in Australia for women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Women who received TGC were invited to complete a survey examining their experiences of the service. A cost analysis was conducted to compare the service to standard, in-person genetic counselling. One hundred and seven women responded (48% response rate); 8 had a BRCA1/2 variant affecting function. Geographical barriers prevented women from accessing genetic services in the past. All participants had a positive attitude towards testing, and regret following testing was minimal. While the impact of testing was greater for those with a positive test result, overall, genetic testing did not put the additional psychosocial burden on the participants. Participant's evaluations of the telephone interactions with the genetic counsellors were highly satisfactory. The service was also found to be cost-effective. This model of telephone genetic counselling was an acceptable and effective way to reduce barriers to BRCA1/2 testing for women with ovarian cancer.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Testes Genéticos / Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso / Proteína BRCA1 / Proteína BRCA2 / Aconselhamento Genético Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Testes Genéticos / Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso / Proteína BRCA1 / Proteína BRCA2 / Aconselhamento Genético Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article