Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric evaluation of a screening question for persistent depressive disorder.
Brinkmann, Elisa; Glanert, Sarah; Hüppe, Michael; Moncada Garay, Ana Sofia; Tschepe, Sophie; Schweiger, Ulrich; Klein, Jan Philipp.
Afiliação
  • Brinkmann E; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. elisabrinkmann@gmail.com.
  • Glanert S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Hüppe M; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Moncada Garay AS; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Tschepe S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Schweiger U; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Klein JP; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
BMC Psychiatry ; 19(1): 119, 2019 04 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31014295
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

About one in five patients with depression experiences a chronic course. Despite the great burden associated with this disease, there is no current screening instrument for Persistent Depressive Disorder (PDD). In the present study, we examine a short screening test, the persistent depression screener (PDS), that we developed for DSM-5 PDD. The PDS is comprised of one question that is administered following an initial self-assessment for depression.

METHODS:

Ninety patients from an inpatient clinic/day clinic specialized in treating depression completed the PDS. They were also assessed using a structured clinical interview covering the DSM-5 criteria for PDD. Retest reliability was examined after two weeks (n = 69, 77%).

RESULTS:

In this sample, the prevalence of PDD was 64%. Sensitivity of the PDS was 85% with a positive predictive value of 80%. Specificity was 63%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.3 and .24, respectively. Agreement between the PDS results and the outcome of the clinical interview was moderate (Cohen's Kappa κ = .48 ([95%-CI .28, .68], p < .001, SE = 0.10)). Prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa was PABAK = .53. Retest reliability of the PDS was moderate (Cohen's Kappa κ = .52 ([95%-CI .3, .74], p < .001, SE = 0.11)).

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study shows that the PDS - when applied following a self-rating depression scale - might be a valid and reliable way to detect PDD. However, the results of the PDS must be confirmed by a diagnostic interview.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica Breve / Autoavaliação (Psicologia) / Transtorno Depressivo Maior Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica Breve / Autoavaliação (Psicologia) / Transtorno Depressivo Maior Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article