Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synthetic polymeric barrier membrane associated with blood coagulum, human allograft, or bovine bone substitute for ridge preservation: a randomized, controlled, clinical and histological trial.
Santana, R; Gyurko, R; Kanasi, E; Xu, W P; Dibart, S.
Afiliação
  • Santana R; Department of Periodontology, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Periodontology, Federal Fluminense University, Dental School, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Gyurko R; Periodontology Department, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kanasi E; Department of Periodontology, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Xu WP; Department of Periodontology, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Dibart S; Department of Periodontology, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: sdibart@bu.edu.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 48(5): 675-683, 2019 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31014520
During the normal healing process, an extraction site may lose significant bone volume, making implant placement problematic. Quantitative evaluations of the amount of bone maintained by socket preservation with various materials are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate, both clinically and histologically, the extent of alveolar bone preservation by blood coagulum (BC) and the potential additional benefits of bone allograft material (AL) versus the state-of-the-art bovine bone mineral (BB), covered by a polyethylene glycol (PEG) barrier, in extraction socket grafting procedures. Adult patients (n=32) with single-rooted teeth indicated for extraction were treated (45 sites). After atraumatic extraction, the sockets were filled with BC, AL, or BB and covered with a synthetic PEG barrier membrane. Changes in bone height and width were measured clinically and the amount of bone formed and residual graft particles were measured histologically after 6 months. Changes in ridge width at 6 months were -1.5mm for AL versus -2.5mm for BB and -2.3mm for BC. New bone formation amounted to 47.8%, 33.3%, and 28.2% at BC-, AL-, and BB-treated sites, respectively. Using AL with the PEG barrier preserved the ridge width at 6 months better than BB or BC and resulted in similar amounts of bone histologically to BB.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Perda do Osso Alveolar / Substitutos Ósseos / Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Perda do Osso Alveolar / Substitutos Ósseos / Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article