Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Force Sensing Resistors for the Measurement of Interface Pressures in Lower Limb Prosthetics.
Swanson, Eric C; Weathersby, Ethan J; Cagle, John C; Sanders, Joan E.
Afiliação
  • Swanson EC; Department of Bioengineering,University of Washington,Seattle, WA 98195.
  • Weathersby EJ; Department of Bioengineering,University of Washington,Seattle, WA 98195.
  • Cagle JC; Department of Bioengineering,University of Washington,Seattle, WA 98195.
  • Sanders JE; Department of Bioengineering,University of Washington,Seattle, WA 98195e-mail: jsanders@uw.edu.
J Biomech Eng ; 141(10)2019 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31017621
Understanding the pressure distributions at the limb-socket interface is essential to the design and evaluation of prosthetic components for lower limb prosthesis users. Force sensing resistors (FSRs) are employed in prosthetics research to measure pressure at this interface due to their low cost, thin profile, and ease of use. While FSRs are known to be sensitive to many sources of error, few studies have systematically quantified these errors using test conditions relevant to lower limb prosthetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate FSR accuracy for the measurement of lower limb prosthetics interface pressures. Two FSR models (Flexiforce A201 and Interlink 402) were subjected to a series of prosthetic-relevant tests. These tests included: (1) static compression, (2) cyclic compression, and (3) a combined static and cyclic compression protocol mimicking a variable activity (walk-sit-stand) procedure. Flexiforce sensors outperformed Interlink sensors and were then subjected to two additional tests: (4) static curvature and (5) static shear stress. Results demonstrated that FSRs experienced significant errors in all five tests. We concluded that: (1) if used carefully, FSRs can provide an estimate of prosthetic interface pressure, but these measurements should be interpreted within the expected range of possible measurement error given the setup; (2) FSRs should be calibrated in a setup that closely matches how they will be used for taking measurements; and (3) both Flexiforce and Interlink sensors can be used to estimate interface pressures; however, in most cases Flexiforce sensors are likely to provide more accurate measurements.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article