Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems.
J Arthroplasty
; 34(8): 1783-1786, 2019 Aug.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31027856
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%). CONCLUSION: Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple "sickle-like" oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted "axe splitting" pattern.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Artroplastia de Quadril
/
Fraturas Periprotéticas
/
Fêmur
/
Prótese de Quadril
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article