Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study.
Ukai, Tomohiko; Ichikawa, Shuhei; Sekimoto, Miho; Shikata, Satoru; Takemura, Yousuke.
Afiliação
  • Ukai T; Department of Community Medicine, TSU, Mie University School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan. a0mb1015-thk@umin.ac.jp.
  • Ichikawa S; Division of Public Health, Osaka Institute of Public Health, 1-3-69 Nakamichi, Higashinari, Osaka, 537-0025, Japan. a0mb1015-thk@umin.ac.jp.
  • Sekimoto M; Department of Education and Research in Family and Community Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
  • Shikata S; Research Center for Health Policy and Economics, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, 2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, 101-8439, Japan.
  • Takemura Y; Department of Family Medicine, Mie Prefectural Ichishi Hospital, 616 Minamiieki, Hakunsan-cho, Tsu, Mie, 515-3133, Japan.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 19(1): 43, 2019 May 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046742
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

On average, patients in Japan with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a clinical consultation every month, although evidence for a favorable follow-up interval is lacking. This study investigated whether the follow-up interval can be extended by comparing the clinical outcomes and cost for monthly versus bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus.

METHODS:

We combined administrative claims data from the National Health Insurance and the Health Checkups Program data of Tsu city, Japan between 2011 and 2014 to conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Propensity scores were used to assemble a matched-pairs cohort from patients who had monthly and bimonthly follow-up. Equivalence between two groups was assessed by designating the proportion of patients who maintained good control of their diabetes in the subsequent year as a primary outcome. The proportion achieving target blood pressure and lipid levels, favorable lifestyle, and annual cost were compared as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS:

Of 12,145 participants, 693 with monthly follow-up and 693 with bimonthly follow-up were matched using propensity scores. In the monthly follow-up group 654 (94.4%) remained under good diabetic control, versus 658 (95.0%) in the bimonthly group (difference 0.6%; 95% confidence interval - 1.8 to 2.9%). All secondary outcomes were equivalent for the monthly and bimonthly follow-up groups except the proportion achieving target blood pressure, the proportion engaging in regular exercise, and annual cost.

CONCLUSIONS:

For patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus, although frequent follow-up by a physician does not affect the control of blood glucose level in the subsequent year, the annual treatment cost becomes much higher. We suggest that patients with well-controlled diabetes can be followed up less often.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Hemoglobinas Glicadas / Biomarcadores / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemiantes / Monitorização Fisiológica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Hemoglobinas Glicadas / Biomarcadores / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemiantes / Monitorização Fisiológica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article