Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasonic debridement management of lower extremity wounds: retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and cost.
Messa, Charles A; Chatman, Brett C; Rhemtulla, Irfan A; Broach, Robyn B; Mauch, Jaclyn T; D'Angelantonio, Albert M; Fischer, John P.
Afiliação
  • Messa CA; Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, US.
  • Chatman BC; Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, US.
  • Rhemtulla IA; Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, US.
  • Broach RB; Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, US.
  • Mauch JT; Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, US.
  • D'Angelantonio AM; Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, US.
  • Fischer JP; Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, US.
J Wound Care ; 28(Sup5): S30-S40, 2019 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31067172
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess wound healing outcomes following direct, low-frequency, high-intensity, ultrasonic debridement as a surgical adjunct for non-healing lower extremity wounds. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing lower extremity wound treatment with direct, low-frequency (22.5 kHz), high-intensity (~60 W/cm2) ultrasonic debridement between January 2010 and January 2016. Clinical outcomes were assessed up to 180-days post-ultrasonic debridement. Descriptive statistics, cost and univariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 82 wounds in 51 patients were included. Mean age was 57.0 years (range: 32-69), and average body mass index (BMI) was 30.8 kg/m². Patient comorbidities consisted of smoking (47%; n=24), hypertension (75%; n=38), diabetes (45%; n=23), and peripheral vascular disease (51%, n=26). Average wound age at initial presentation was 1013 days (range: 2-5475 days) with an average wound size of 9.0cm x 7.4cm. At 180-days post-debridement, 60% (n=49) of wounds had completely healed. Readmission (47%; n=24) and reoperation (45%; n=23) rates were characterised by the reason for readmission and reoperation respectively. Readmission for wound healing (70%, n=39) was primarily for further debridements (41%; n=16). Wound infection (30%; n=7) was the most common readmission for wound complications (30%; n=17). Reoperations primarily consisted of treatments for further wound healing 96% (n=51). Cost analysis showed a lower total treatment cost for patients with improved healing ($78,698), compared with non-improved wounds ($137,707). CONCLUSION: In a complex, heterogeneous cohort of chronic extremity wounds, the use of direct, low-frequency, high-intensity, ultrasonic debridement is a safe and reliable adjunctive therapy for the management of these wounds.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Cutânea / Ultrassom / Desbridamento / Traumatismos da Perna Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Cutânea / Ultrassom / Desbridamento / Traumatismos da Perna Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article