Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimated treatment effect of ticagrelor versus aspirin by investigator-assessed events compared with judgement by an independent event adjudication committee in the SOCRATES trial.
Easton, J Donald; Denison, Hans; Evans, Scott R; Knutsson, Mikael; Amarenco, Pierre; Albers, Gregory W; Ladenvall, Per; Minematsu, Kazuo; Molina, Carlos A; Wang, Yongjun; Wong, Ks Lawrence; Johnston, S Claiborne.
Afiliação
  • Easton JD; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
  • Denison H; Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Evans SR; Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, USA.
  • Knutsson M; Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Amarenco P; Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Bichat Hospital, Paris University, Paris, France.
  • Albers GW; Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
  • Ladenvall P; Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Minematsu K; Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • Molina CA; Stroke Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Wang Y; Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Wong KL; Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Johnston SC; Dean's Office, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Int J Stroke ; 14(9): 908-914, 2019 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092152
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adjudication of endpoints is a standard procedure in cardiovascular clinical trials. However, several studies indicate that the benefit of adjudication in estimating treatment effect may be limited.

AIMS:

This post hoc analysis of SOCRATES (NCT01994720) compared the treatment effects and investigated the agreement of clinical event assessment by site investigators and independent adjudicators.

METHODS:

SOCRATES compared ticagrelor and aspirin in 13,199 patients with acute minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. The primary endpoint was stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. Stroke was the major component of the primary endpoint and a secondary endpoint. The endpoints were adjudicated by a blinded independent committee. We compared the treatment effect on the primary endpoint and stroke alone based on the investigators' and adjudicators' assessments, and investigated the agreement rate on the stroke endpoint and major hemorrhages.

RESULTS:

The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for ticagrelor versus aspirin therapy for the primary endpoint were 0.89 (0.78-1.01) when calculated on adjudicator-assessed events and 0.88 (0.78-1.00) for investigator-assessed events. The hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for stroke were 0.86 (0.75-0.99) based on the adjudicators' diagnoses and 0.85 (0.75-0.97) based on the investigators' diagnoses. The overall agreement between adjudicator- and investigator-diagnosed stroke was 91%, and for major hemorrhages was 88%.

CONCLUSIONS:

In SOCRATES, there was no clinically meaningful difference in the estimated treatment effect, on either the primary endpoint or stroke, by using investigator- or adjudicator-assessed events. Double-blind treatment outcome studies with stroke endpoints may not benefit from adjudication. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01994720.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Ataque Isquêmico Transitório / Aspirina / Mortalidade / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Ticagrelor / Hemorragia / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Ataque Isquêmico Transitório / Aspirina / Mortalidade / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Ticagrelor / Hemorragia / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article