Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid-related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data.
Green, Carla A; Hazlehurst, Brian; Brandes, John; Sapp, Daniel S; Janoff, Shannon L; Coplan, Paul M; DeVeaugh-Geiss, Angela.
Afiliação
  • Green CA; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
  • Hazlehurst B; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
  • Brandes J; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
  • Sapp DS; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
  • Janoff SL; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
  • Coplan PM; Department of Epidemiology, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
  • DeVeaugh-Geiss A; Indivior, Richmond, Virginia.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(8): 1138-1142, 2019 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31095831
PURPOSE: To facilitate surveillance and evaluate interventions addressing opioid-related overdoses, algorithms are needed for use in large health care databases to identify and differentiate community-occurring opioid-related overdoses from inpatient-occurring opioid-related overdose/oversedation. METHODS: Data were from Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), a large integrated health plan. We iteratively developed and evaluated an algorithm for electronically identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation in KPNW hospitals from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. Chart audits assessed accuracy; data sources included administrative and clinical records. RESULTS: The best-performing algorithm used these rules: (1) Include events with opioids administered in an inpatient setting (including emergency department/urgent care) followed by naloxone administration within 275 hours of continuous inpatient stay; (2) exclude events with electroconvulsive therapy procedure codes; and (3) exclude events in which an opioid was administered prior to hospital discharge and followed by readmission with subsequent naloxone administration. Using this algorithm, we identified 870 suspect inpatient overdose/oversedation events and chart audited a random sample of 235. Of the random sample, 185 (78.7%) were deemed overdoses/oversedation, 37 (15.5%) were not, and 13 (5.5%) were possible cases. The number of hours between time of opioid and naloxone administration did not affect algorithm accuracy. When "possible" overdoses/oversedations were included with confirmed events, overall positive predictive value (PPV) was very good (PPV = 84.0%). Additionally, PPV was reasonable when evaluated specifically for hospital stays with emergency/urgent care admissions (PPV = 77.0%) and excellent for elective surgery admissions (PPV = 97.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm performance was reasonable for identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation with best performance among elective surgery patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Overdose de Drogas / Analgésicos Opioides / Pacientes Internados Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Overdose de Drogas / Analgésicos Opioides / Pacientes Internados Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article