Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
No Effect of an Automated Bolus Calculator in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: The Expert Kids Study.
Madsen, Jens Otto Broby; Casteels, Kristina; Fieuws, Steffen; Kristensen, Kurt; Vanbrabant, Koen; Ramon-Krauel, Marta; Johannesen, Jesper.
Afiliação
  • Madsen JOB; 1 Department of Pediatrics, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Casteels K; 2 Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Fieuws S; 3 Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Kristensen K; 4 Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven-University of Leuven & Universiteit Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Vanbrabant K; 5 Department of Pediatrics, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Ramon-Krauel M; 4 Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven-University of Leuven & Universiteit Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Johannesen J; 6 Department of Endocrinology, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Deu, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 21(6): 322-328, 2019 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31157566
ABSTRACT

Background:

This multicenter crossover study investigated the potential beneficial effect of an automated bolus calculator (ABC) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with multiple daily injections (MDI).

Methods:

Participants were randomized to either begin or end with a 5 months intervention versus their regular treatment regimen (control), separated by a 2 months washout period. During the intervention participants were carefully instructed to use the ABC (Accu-Check Aviva Expert) versus manual insulin calculations during the control period. Participants between 8 and 18 years of age with T1D were recruited from clinics in Denmark, Belgium, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included T1D for >1 year, a minimum of 3 months MDI treatment before inclusion, and HbA1c of 7.5%-11% (57-97 mmol/mol). Improvement in HbA1c was the main outcome, and improved quality of life (QoL) and glucose variability (time spent in target glucose) were secondary outcomes.

Results:

A total of 65 patients with a mean age of 13.25 years and a mean HbA1c of 8.25% (66.7 mmol/mol) were included. Midway evaluation after 2 months of intervention showed no significant difference from the standard care (0.297, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.645 to 0.054; P = 0.10). The difference remained insignificant after the 5 months of intervention (-0.143 [95% CI -0.558 to 0.272; P = 0.51]). Using the ABC did not change the time spent in target glucose range, nor did it change the QoL.

Conclusions:

Our study did not demonstrate beneficial additive effects of an ABC in children and adolescents with T1D treated with MDI neither in HbA1c, nor in any other endpoint investigated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Automonitorização da Glicemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Automonitorização da Glicemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article