Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The German version of the high-performance work systems questionnaire (HPWS-G) in the context of patient safety: a validation study in a Swiss university hospital.
Mielke, Juliane; De Geest, Sabina; Beckmann, Sonja; Leppla, Lynn; Luta, Xhyljeta; Guerbaai, Raphaelle-Ashley; Hunziker, Sabina; Schwendimann, René.
Afiliação
  • Mielke J; Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • De Geest S; Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Beckmann S; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Leppla L; Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Luta X; Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Guerbaai RA; Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Hunziker S; Departments of Hematology and Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Schwendimann R; Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 356, 2019 Jun 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31170976
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High performance work systems (HPWSs) are successful work systems in the context of safety climate and patient safety. The 10-item HPWS questionnaire is a validated instrument developed to assess existing HPWS structures in hospitals. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to translate the English HPWS questionnaire into German (HPWS-G), to rate its content validity, and to examine its psychometric properties.

METHODS:

Content validity was examined by a panel of 12 physicians and nurses, and I-CVI and S-CVI calculated. For internal consistency, Cronbach's α and item-scale correlations were determined. Construct validity was measured via confirmatory factor analysis. A convenience sample of 782 nurses and physicians in a University hospital setting in Switzerland's German-speaking region was surveyed. Four inclusion criteria were applied working in intensive care, emergency department or operating room; having daily patient contact; having worked in the current clinical area for more than three months; and more than 40% employment.

RESULTS:

A total of 281 questionnaires were completed (response rate 35.9%). Overall, the 10-item HPWS-G questionnaire showed good content validity (I-CVI = .83-1; S-CVI = .86) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .853). HPWS-G scores correlated significantly with safety climate (rs = .657, p < .01) and teamwork climate (rs = .615, p < .01). The proposed 1-factor model was accepted considering results of applied minimum rank factor analysis; a confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable to good model fit (GFI = .968; CFI = .902; RMSEA = .043).

CONCLUSIONS:

The HPWS-G showed good psychometric properties. In clinical practice it can be used to assess HPWS practices and for intra- and inter-hospital benchmarking. Some minor adaptions to the wording could be made as well as reassessing the psychometric properties at other clinical sites.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Traduções / Inquéritos e Questionários / Segurança do Paciente / Hospitais Universitários Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Traduções / Inquéritos e Questionários / Segurança do Paciente / Hospitais Universitários Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article