Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized clinical study to compare negative pressure wound therapy with simultaneous saline irrigation and traditional negative pressure wound therapy for complex foot infections.
Davis, Kathryn E; La Fontaine, Javier; Farrar, David; Oz, Orhan K; Crisologo, Peter A; Berriman, Sandra; Lavery, Lawrence A.
Afiliação
  • Davis KE; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • La Fontaine J; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Farrar D; Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Oz OK; Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Crisologo PA; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Berriman S; Berriman Consulting, Princeton, New Jersey.
  • Lavery LA; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Wound Repair Regen ; 28(1): 97-104, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31245901
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) devices and NPWT with and without simultaneous irrigation in patients admitted to hospital with moderate and severe foot infections. Ninety patients were randomized in a 12-week prospective, randomized noninferiority trial to compare wound healing in patients with moderate and severe infected foot wounds treated with NPWT after surgery. Inclusion criteria included ABI > 0.5 or toe pressures >30 PVR/mmHg, >18 years of age and exclusion included active Charcot arthropathy, collagen vascular disease, HIV, and hypercoagulable state. We compared two different traditional devices, NPWT-K (KCI, VAC Ulta) and NPWT-C (Cardinal, PRO), and NPWT-I with saline irrigation (Cardinal, PRO). All patients had therapy delivered at 125 mmHg continuous pressure. In patients who received simultaneous saline irrigation (NPWT-I), the administration rate was 15 ml per hour. The primary outcome was the proportion of healed wounds in 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included surgical wound closure, number of surgeries, length of stay, and time to wound healing. Continuous data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables and chi-square to compare dichotomous variables with an alpha of 0.05. There were no differences in outcomes among NPWT-I, NPWT-C, and NPWT-K groups in proportion of healed wounds (63.3%, 50.0%, 46.7% p = 0.39), surgical wound closure (83.3%, 80.0%, 63.3%, p = 0.15), number of surgeries (2.0 ± 0.49, 2.4 ± 0.77, 2.4 ± 0.68, p = 0.06), length of stay (16.3 ± 15.7, 14.7 ± 7.4, 15.3 ± 10.5 days, p = 0.87), time to wound healing (46.2 ± 22.8, 40.9 ± 18.8, 45.9 ± 28.3 days, p = 0.78). We did not identify any significant differences in clinical outcomes or adverse events between patients treated with different NPWT devices or NPWT with and without irrigation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteomielite / Infecção dos Ferimentos / Pé Diabético / Infecções dos Tecidos Moles / Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa / Irrigação Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteomielite / Infecção dos Ferimentos / Pé Diabético / Infecções dos Tecidos Moles / Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa / Irrigação Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article