Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of outcomes of salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for post-primary radiation vs focal therapy.
Onol, Fikret Fatih; Bhat, Seetharam; Moschovas, Marcio; Rogers, Travis; Ganapathi, Hariharan; Roof, Shannon; Rocco, Bernardo; Patel, Vipul.
Afiliação
  • Onol FF; Advent Health Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
  • Bhat S; Advent Health Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
  • Moschovas M; Advent Health Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
  • Rogers T; Advent Health Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
  • Ganapathi H; Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Roof S; Advent Health Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
  • Rocco B; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Patel V; Advent Health Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
BJU Int ; 125(1): 103-111, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31430422
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) outcomes in patients who underwent radiation and those who underwent focal ablation as primary therapies. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We evaluated 126 patients who underwent salvage RALPbetween 2008 and 2018. Of these, 94 (74.6%) received radiation and 32 focal ablation (25.4%) as primary therapy. These groups were compared with regard to clinical, oncological and functional outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and regression models were used to identify survival estimations and their predictors.

RESULTS:

Before surgery, more patients were potent in the focal ablation group compared to the radiation group (46.9% vs 22.6%; P = 0.013). Peri-operative characteristics and complication rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Postoperative catheterization duration was shorter in the focal ablation group (mean 10 vs 16 days; P = 0.018). At final pathology, the focal ablation group had higher non-organ-confined disease (71% vs 50%; P = 0.042) and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates (43.8% vs 17%; P = 0.004) as compared to the radiation group; however, 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates were similar (59% vs 56%; P = 0.761). Postoperative 1-year full (no pads/day) and social (0-1 pad/day) continence rates were significantly higher in the focal ablation as compared to the radiation group (77.3% vs 39.2%, P = 0.002, and 87.5% vs 51.3%, P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed primary focal ablation and nerve-sparing to be predictors of postoperative continence. Erectile function was preserved in 13% and 27% of preoperatively potent patients in the radiation and focal ablation groups, respectively (P = 0.435). No predictors were identified for postoperative potency.

CONCLUSIONS:

Radiation was associated with inferior functional outcomes after salvage RALP. Focal therapies were associated with higher non-organ-confined disease and PSMrates, with no significant difference in short-term BCR-free survival.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prostatectomia / Neoplasias da Próstata / Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prostatectomia / Neoplasias da Próstata / Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article