Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound During Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting with Proximal Protection.
Morr, Simon; Vakharia, Kunal; Fanous, Andrew A; Waqas, Muhammad; Siddiqui, Adnan H.
Afiliação
  • Morr S; Neurosurgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia and Cornell, New York, USA.
  • Vakharia K; Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute/Kaleida Health, Buffalo, USA.
  • Fanous AA; Neurosciences, INOVA Medical Group Neurosurgery, Alexandria, USA.
  • Waqas M; Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute/Kaleida Health, Buffalo, USA.
  • Siddiqui AH; Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, USA.
Cureus ; 11(6): e4935, 2019 Jun 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31431840
ABSTRACT
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an established treatment for patients at high-risk for endarterectomy. Patients who undergo CAS have been shown to have periprocedural microembolic events on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Flow reversal is often applied in these situations to prevent distal emboli and concurrently allow blood to flush into the common carotid artery. Patients who demonstrate soft plaque morphology that may embolize distally during CAS benefit from flow reversal. Even so, the all-stroke risk in these patients is nearly 1.4%. High-risk patients typically have more difficult plaque morphology; flow reversal decreases the rate of distal emboli but does not offer the intraprocedural visualization seen with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In this paper, we illustrate potential periprocedural outcomes associated with stenting of the stenotic carotid bifurcation under flow reversal and how IVUS influenced endovascular management. Three high-risk patients who underwent CAS with direct common carotid artery cutdown approaches due to common carotid ostia disease with flow-reversal proximal embolic protection also had intraprocedural IVUS performed to evaluate plaque morphology and stability before the protection system was removed. Case 1 illustrates no intraluminal thrombus on IVUS, requiring no further intervention after stent placement. Case 2 demonstrates intraluminal thrombus on IVUS requiring a second stent to stabilize plaque. Case 3 shows the inadequate resolution of thrombus after a second stent, which was addressed with balloon angioplasty. In our experience, using IVUS as an adjunct to CAS under proximal embolic protection helped demonstrate plaque morphology and plaque fragmentation after stent placement. These cases illustrate the potential benefit of allowing stabilization of the plaque before flow reversal is stopped.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article