Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations: is dose escalation mandatory for phase I trials?
Simmet, V; Eberst, L; Marabelle, A; Cassier, P A.
Afiliação
  • Simmet V; Medical Oncology Department, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon; Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Angers; Medical School, University of Angers, Angers. Electronic address: victor.simmet@gmail.com.
  • Eberst L; Medical Oncology Department, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon; Medical School, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon.
  • Marabelle A; Drug Development Department (DITEP), Paris-Saclay University; INSERM U1015, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Cassier PA; Medical Oncology Department, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon.
Ann Oncol ; 30(11): 1751-1759, 2019 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31435659
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Numerous phase I trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI)-based combinations are currently being conducted to improve response rates observed with single agents. However, methodology varies across studies, especially regarding the use of dose escalation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A literature search was conducted in Pubmed and major oncology meetings libraries for phase I trials reported between 2011 and 2018, containing at least one CPI [CLTA-4 blocking antibody or a PD(L)1 blocking antibody] plus at least one second agent (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitor, chemotherapy). Dose escalation schemes, target doses and recommended phase II doses (RP2D) were captured in our database for each study. Combination RP2D (combo-RP2D) was compared with target dose.

RESULTS:

We identified 113 different studies comprising a total of 120 individual cohorts. The backbone was an anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) in 40 cohorts and an anti-PD(L)1 in 80 cohorts. Dose escalation was used for the CPI in 29 (24%) cohorts [11% for anti-PD(L)1 and 50% for anti-CTLA-4] and for the second agent in 55 cohorts (46%). For 31 s agents (26%), the combo-RP2D was significantly lower than the expected target dose. Failure to reach the target dose was explained by the type of second agent form (e.g. small molecules versus monoclonal antibodies) (P < 0.001) and the choice of trial design for the second agent by investigators.

CONCLUSION:

Design of studies investigating new CPI-based combinations must consider the type of second agent. Dose escalation is required for combinations with small molecules but is unnecessary with vaccine/virus/dendritic therapies and monoclonal antibodies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto / Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases / Antineoplásicos Imunológicos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto / Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases / Antineoplásicos Imunológicos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article