Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Environmental sciences benefit from robust evidence irrespective of speed.
Roche, Dominique G; Bennett, Joseph R; Provencher, Jennifer; Rytwinski, Trina; Haddaway, Neal R; Cooke, Steven J.
Afiliação
  • Roche DG; Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address: dominique.roche@mail.mcgill.ca.
  • Bennett JR; Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Provencher J; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, QC, Canada.
  • Rytwinski T; Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Haddaway NR; Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Africa Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Cooke SJ; Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sci Total Environ ; 696: 134000, 2019 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31465915
ABSTRACT
Discussions around the "slow science movement" abound in environmental sciences, yet they are generally counterproductive. Researchers must focus on producing robust and transparent knowledge, regardless of speed. Slow versus fast science is irrelevant - what we need is reproducible research to support evidence-based decision making and tackle urgent and costly environmental problems.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article