Explaining variation of implementation outcomes of centralized waiting lists for unattached patients.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Centralized waiting lists (CWLs) for patient attachment to a primary care provider have been implemented across Canada, including Quebec. Little is known about the implementation of CWLs and the factors that influence implementation outcomes of such primary care innovations. The purpose of this paper is to explain variations in the outcomes of implementation by analyzing the characteristics of CWLs and contextual factors that influence their implementation. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A multiple qualitative case study was conducted. Four contrasting CWLs were purposefully selected two relatively high-performing and two relatively low-performing cases with regard to process indicators. Data collected between 2015 and 2016 drew on three sources 26 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, 22 documents and field notes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to identify, through a cross-case comparison of ratings, constructs that distinguish high from low-performing cases. FINDINGS: Five constructs distinguished high from low-performing cases three related to the inner setting: network and communications; leadership engagement; available resources; one from innovation characteristics adaptability with regard to registration, evaluation of priority and attachment to a family physician; and, one associated with process domain engaging. Other constructs exerted influence on implementation (e.g. outer setting, individual characteristics), but did not distinguish high and low-performing cases. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This is the first in-depth analysis of CWL implementation. Results suggest important factors that might be useful in efforts to continuously improve implementation performance of CWLs and similar innovations.