Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Age Differences in Negative, but Not Positive, Rumination.
Emery, Lisa; Sorrell, Anne; Miles, Cassidy.
Afiliação
  • Emery L; Department of Psychology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
  • Sorrell A; Department of Psychology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
  • Miles C; Department of Psychology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 75(1): 80-84, 2020 01 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504914
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The main objective of this study was to determine whether there are age differences in positive and negative repetitive thought (ie, rumination).

METHOD:

Young adults (ages 19-39; n = 114) and older adults (ages 60-85; n = 88) completed measures of negative and positive rumination. Bayesian analyses were used to determine whether age differences were present for both negative (young > old) and positive (old > young) rumination.

RESULTS:

There was extremely strong evidence for age differences in negative rumination, with lower scores in older adults. In contrast, the evidence was in favor of the null hypothesis for positive rumination.

DISCUSSION:

Age-related positivity is better characterized as decreased dwelling on the meaning of negative moods, rather than increased attention to positive ones.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Envelhecimento / Afeto / Ruminação Cognitiva / Regulação Emocional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Envelhecimento / Afeto / Ruminação Cognitiva / Regulação Emocional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article