Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries.
Jordans, Mark; Chisholm, Dan; Semrau, Maya; Gurung, Dristy; Abdulmalik, Jibril; Ahuja, Shalini; Mugisha, James; Mntambo, Ntokozo; Kigozi, Fred; Petersen, Inge; Shidhaye, Rahul; Upadhaya, Nawaraj; Lund, Crick; Thornicroft, Graham; Gureje, Oye.
Afiliação
  • Jordans M; Reader, Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
  • Chisholm D; Programme Manager for Mental Health, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
  • Semrau M; Research Fellow, Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London; and Global Health and Infection Department, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
  • Gurung D; Research Coordinator, Transcultural Psychosocial Organization, Nepal.
  • Abdulmalik J; Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Ahuja S; Researcher, Public Health Foundation of India & Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
  • Mugisha J; Senior Lecturer, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda & Butabika National Referral and Teaching Mental Hospital, Uganda.
  • Mntambo N; Researcher, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa.
  • Kigozi F; Senior Consultant Psychiatrist and Researcher, Butabika National Referral and Teaching Mental Hospital, Uganda.
  • Petersen I; Research Professor and Director, Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
  • Shidhaye R; Clinical Psychiatrist, Public Health Foundation of India, India; and CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
  • Upadhaya N; Researcher, Transcultural Psychosocial Organization, Nepal.
  • Lund C; Professor of Public Mental Health and Professor of Global Mental Health and Development, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa, and Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Depa
  • Thornicroft G; Professor of Community Psychiatry, Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
  • Gureje O; Professor of Psychiatry and Director, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neurosciences and Substance Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; and Professor Extraordinary, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
BJPsych Open ; 5(5): e70, 2019 Aug 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31530320
BACKGROUND: In most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), routine mental health information is unavailable or unreliable, making monitoring of mental healthcare coverage difficult. This study aims to evaluate a new set of mental health indicators introduced in primary healthcare settings in five LMIC. METHOD: A survey was conducted among primary healthcare workers (n = 272) to assess the acceptability and feasibility of eight new indicators monitoring mental healthcare needs, utilisation, quality and payments. Also, primary health facility case records (n = 583) were reviewed by trained research assistants to assess the level of completion (yes/no) for each of the indicators and subsequently the level of correctness of completion (correct/incorrect - with incorrect defined as illogical, missing or illegible information) of the indicators used by health workers. Assessments were conducted within 1 month of the introduction of the indicators, as well as 6-9 months afterwards. RESULTS: Across both time points and across all indicators, 78% of the measurements of indicators were complete. Among the best performing indicators (diagnosis, severity and treatment), this was significantly higher. With regards to correctness, 87% of all completed indicators were correctly completed. There was a trend towards improvement over time. Health workers' perceptions on feasibility and utility, across sites and over time, indicated a positive attitude in 81% of all measurements. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates high levels of performance and perceived utility for a set of indicators that could ultimately be used to monitor coverage of mental healthcare in primary healthcare settings in LMIC. We recommend that these indicators are incorporated into existing health information systems and adopted within the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Programme implementation strategy. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article