Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systemic treatments in MDM2 positive intimal sarcoma: A multicentre experience with anthracycline, gemcitabine, and pazopanib within the World Sarcoma Network.
Frezza, Anna Maria; Assi, Tarek; Lo Vullo, Salvatore; Ben-Ami, Eytan; Dufresne, Armelle; Yonemori, Kan; Noguchi, Emi; Siontis, Brittany; Ferraro, Richard; Teterycz, Pawel; Duffaud, Florence; Ravi, Vinod; Vincenzi, Bruno; Gelderblom, Hans; Pantaleo, Maria A; Baldi, Giacomo G; Desar, Ingrid; Fedenko, Alexander; Maki, Robert G; Jones, Robin L; Benjamin, Robert S; Blay, Jean Yves; Kawai, Akira; Gounder, Mrinal; Gronchi, Alessandro; Le Cesne, Axel; Mir, Olivier; Czarnecka, Anna M; Schuetze, Scott; Wagner, Andrew J; Adam, Julien; Barisella, Marta; Sbaraglia, Marta; Hornick, Jason L; Meurgey, Alexandra; Mariani, Luigi; Casali, Paolo G; Thornton, Katherine; Stacchiotti, Silvia.
Afiliação
  • Frezza AM; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Assi T; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
  • Lo Vullo S; Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Ben-Ami E; Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Dufresne A; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.
  • Yonemori K; Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Noguchi E; Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Siontis B; Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Ferraro R; Department of Medicine, Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Teterycz P; Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Duffaud F; Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
  • Ravi V; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Vincenzi B; Department of Medical Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
  • Gelderblom H; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
  • Pantaleo MA; Department of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Baldi GG; Department of Medical Oncology, Nuovo Ospedale "S. Stefano,", Prato, Italy.
  • Desar I; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Fedenko A; Department of Medical Oncology, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Maki RG; Medical Oncology, Northwell Cancer Institute and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Long Island, New York.
  • Jones RL; Sarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
  • Benjamin RS; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Blay JY; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.
  • Kawai A; Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Gounder M; Department of Medicine, Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Gronchi A; Sarcoma Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
  • Le Cesne A; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
  • Mir O; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
  • Czarnecka AM; Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Schuetze S; Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Wagner AJ; Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Adam J; Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
  • Barisella M; Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Sbaraglia M; Department of Pathology, Treviso Regional Hospital, Italy.
  • Hornick JL; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Meurgey A; Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
  • Mariani L; Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Casali PG; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Thornton K; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Stacchiotti S; Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer ; 126(1): 98-104, 2020 01 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31536651
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intimal sarcoma (InS) is an exceedingly rare neoplasm with an unfavorable prognosis, for which new potentially active treatments are under development. We report on the activity of anthracycline-based regimens, gemcitabine-based regimens, and pazopanib in patients with InS.

METHODS:

Seventeen sarcoma reference centers in Europe, the United States, and Japan contributed data to this retrospective analysis. Patients with MDM2-positive InS who were treated with anthracycline-based regimens, gemcitabine-based regimens, or pazopanib between October 2001 and January 2018 were selected. Local pathological review was performed to confirm diagnosis. Response was assessed by RECIST1.1. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were computed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

Seventy-two patients were included (66 anthracycline-based regimens; 26 gemcitabine-based regimens; 12 pazopanib). In the anthracycline-based group, 24 (36%) patients were treated for localized disease, and 42 (64%) patients were treated for advanced disease. The real-world overall response rate (rwORR) was 38%. For patients with localized disease, the median RFS was 14.6 months. For patients with advanced disease, the median PFS was 7.7 months. No anthracycline-related cardiac toxicity was reported in patients with cardiac InS (n = 26). For gemcitabine and pazopanib, the rwORR was 8%, and the median PFS was 3.2 and 3.7 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

This retrospective series shows the activity of anthracycline-based regimens in InS. Of note, anthracyclines were used in patients with cardiac InS with no significant cardiac toxicity. The prognosis in patients with InS remains poor, and new active drugs and treatment strategies are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Túnica Íntima / Neoplasias Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Túnica Íntima / Neoplasias Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article