Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a Clinical Aberrometer Using Pyramidal Wavefront Sensing.
Singh, Neeraj K; Jaskulski, Matt; Ramasubramanian, Viswanathan; Meyer, Dawn; Reed, Olivia; Rickert, Martin E; Bradley, Arthur; Kollbaum, Pete S.
Afiliação
  • Jaskulski M; School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
  • Ramasubramanian V; School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
  • Meyer D; School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
  • Reed O; School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
  • Rickert ME; School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
  • Bradley A; School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
  • Kollbaum PS; School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Optom Vis Sci ; 96(10): 733-744, 2019 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31592956
ABSTRACT

SIGNIFICANCE:

Measurement of ocular aberrations is a critical component of many optical corrections.

PURPOSE:

This study examines the accuracy and repeatability of a newly available high-resolution pyramidal wavefront sensor-based aberrometer (Osiris by Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Firenze, Italy).

METHODS:

An engineered model eye and a dilated presbyopic eye were used to assess accuracy and repeatability of aberration measurements after systematic introduction of lower- and higher-order aberrations with calibrated trial lenses (sphere +10.00 to -10.00 D, and astigmatic -4.00 and -2.00 D with axis 180, 90, and 45°) and phase plates (-0.57 to 0.60 µm of Seidel spherical aberration defined over a 6-mm pupil diameter). Osiris aberration measurements were compared with those acquired on a previously calibrated COAS-HD aberrometer for foveal and peripheral optics both with and without multizone dual-focus contact lenses. The impact of simulated axial and lateral misalignment was evaluated.

RESULTS:

Root-mean-square errors for paraxial sphere (corneal plane), cylinder, and axis were, respectively, 0.07, 0.11 D, and 1.8° for the engineered model and 0.15, 0.26 D, and 2.7° for the presbyopic eye. Repeatability estimates (i.e., standard deviation of 10 repeat measures) for the model and presbyopic eyes were 0.026 and 0.039 D for spherical error. Root-mean-square errors of 0.01 and 0.02 µm, respectively, were observed for primary spherical aberration and horizontal coma (model eye). Foveal and peripheral measures of higher- and lower-order aberrations measured with the Osiris closely matched parallel data collected with the COAS-HD aberrometer both with and without dual-focus zonal bifocal contact lenses. Operator errors of focus and alignment introduced changes of 0.018 and 0.02 D/mm in sphere estimates.

CONCLUSIONS:

The newly available clinical pyramidal aberrometer provided accurate and repeatable measures of lower- and higher-order aberrations, even in the challenging but clinically important cases of peripheral retina and multifocal optics.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Aberrações de Frente de Onda da Córnea / Aberrometria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Aberrações de Frente de Onda da Córnea / Aberrometria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article